API Versioning for Rails Routes
A couple of things to add:
Your redirect match isn't going to work for certain routes - the *api
param is greedy and will swallow up everything, e.g. /api/asdf/users/1
will redirect to /api/v2/1
. You'd be better off using a regular param like :api
. Admittedly it won't match cases like /api/asdf/asdf/users/1
but if you have nested resources in your api it's a better solution.
Ryan WHY U NO LIKE namespace
? :-), e.g:
current_api_routes = lambda do
resources :users
end
namespace :api do
scope :module => :v2, ¤t_api_routes
namespace :v2, ¤t_api_routes
namespace :v1, ¤t_api_routes
match ":api/*path", :to => redirect("/api/v2/%{path}")
end
Which has the added benefit of versioned and generic named routes. One additional note - the convention when using :module
is to use underscore notation, e.g: api/v1
not 'Api::V1'. At one point the latter didn't work but I believe it was fixed in Rails 3.1.
Also, when you release v3 of your API the routes would be updated like this:
current_api_routes = lambda do
resources :users
end
namespace :api do
scope :module => :v3, ¤t_api_routes
namespace :v3, ¤t_api_routes
namespace :v2, ¤t_api_routes
namespace :v1, ¤t_api_routes
match ":api/*path", :to => redirect("/api/v3/%{path}")
end
Of course it's likely that your API has different routes between versions in which case you can do this:
current_api_routes = lambda do
# Define latest API
end
namespace :api do
scope :module => :v3, ¤t_api_routes
namespace :v3, ¤t_api_routes
namespace :v2 do
# Define API v2 routes
end
namespace :v1 do
# Define API v1 routes
end
match ":api/*path", :to => redirect("/api/v3/%{path}")
end
I'm not a big fan of versioning by routes. We built VersionCake to support an easier form of API versioning.
By including the API version number in the filename of each of our respective views (jbuilder, RABL, etc), we keep the versioning unobtrusive and allow for easy degradation to support backwards compatibility (e.g. if v5 of the view doesn't exist, we render v4 of the view).
If at all possible, I would suggest rethinking your urls so that the version isn't in the url, but is put into the accepts header. This stack overflow answer goes into it well:
Best practices for API versioning?
and this link shows exactly how to do that with rails routing:
http://freelancing-gods.com/posts/versioning_your_ap_is
The original form of this answer is wildly different, and can be found here. Just proof that there's more than one way to skin a cat.
I've updated the answer since to use namespaces and to use 301 redirects -- rather than the default of 302. Thanks to pixeltrix and Bo Jeanes for the prompting on those things.
You might want to wear a really strong helmet because this is going to blow your mind.
The Rails 3 routing API is super wicked. To write the routes for your API, as per your requirements above, you need just this:
namespace :api do
namespace :v1 do
resources :users
end
namespace :v2 do
resources :users
end
match 'v:api/*path', :to => redirect("/api/v2/%{path}")
match '*path', :to => redirect("/api/v2/%{path}")
end
If your mind is still intact after this point, let me explain.
First, we call namespace
which is super handy for when you want a bunch of routes scoped to a specific path and module that are similarly named. In this case, we want all routes inside the block for our namespace
to be scoped to controllers within the Api
module and all requests to paths inside this route will be prefixed with api
. Requests such as /api/v2/users
, ya know?
Inside the namespace, we define two more namespaces (woah!). This time we're defining the "v1" namespace, so all routes for the controllers here will be inside the V1
module inside the Api
module: Api::V1
. By defining resources :users
inside this route, the controller will be located at Api::V1::UsersController
. This is version 1, and you get there by making requests like /api/v1/users
.
Version 2 is only a tiny bit different. Instead of the controller serving it being at Api::V1::UsersController
, it's now at Api::V2::UsersController
. You get there by making requests like /api/v2/users
.
Next, a match
is used. This will match all API routes that go to things like /api/v3/users
.
This is the part I had to look up. The :to =>
option allows you to specify that a specific request should be redirected somewhere else -- I knew that much -- but I didn't know how to get it to redirect to somewhere else and pass in a piece of the original request along with it.
To do this, we call the redirect
method and pass it a string with a special-interpolated %{path}
parameter. When a request comes in that matches this final match
, it will interpolate the path
parameter into the location of %{path}
inside the string and redirect the user to where they need to go.
Finally, we use another match
to route all remaining paths prefixed with /api
and redirect them to /api/v2/%{path}
. This means requests like /api/users
will go to /api/v2/users
.
I couldn't figure out how to get /api/asdf/users
to match, because how do you determine if that is supposed to be a request to /api/<resource>/<identifier>
or /api/<version>/<resource>
?
Anyway, this was fun to research and I hope it helps you!