Are ARM instructuons SWI and SVC exactly same thing?

There is a good UAL vs pre-UAL mnemonic table on ARMv8 Appendix K6 "Legacy Instruction Syntax for AArch32 Instruction Sets"

One of the entries of that table is:

Pre-UAL syntax    UAL equivalent
SWI               SVC

which explicitly states that they are equivalent.

On GNU GAS, you can select the UAL syntax with .syntax unified.

From GCC, you can use the option -masm-syntax-unified for inline assembly, although it wasn't working in 8.2.0 due to a then fixed bug: How to write .syntax unified UAL ARMv7 inline assembly in GCC?

UAL vs pre-UAL also has further implications besides the names of certain instructions, e.g. the requirement for # or not in certain integer literals: Is the hash required for immediate values in ARM assembly?

Yes, SWI and SVC are same thing, it is just a name change. Previously, the SVC instruction was called SWI, Software Interrupt.

The opcode for SVC (and SWI) is partially user defined (bit 0-23 is user defined and is like a parameter to SVC handler). Bits 24-27 are b1111 and these 4 bits makes CPU to realize that the opcode is SVC (or SWI). see ARM Information Center for more details.