Best practice to return errors in ASP.NET Web API
You can throw a HttpResponseException
HttpResponseMessage response =
this.Request.CreateErrorResponse(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest, "your message");
throw new HttpResponseException(response);
ASP.NET Web API 2 really simplified it. For example, the following code:
public HttpResponseMessage GetProduct(int id)
{
Product item = repository.Get(id);
if (item == null)
{
var message = string.Format("Product with id = {0} not found", id);
HttpError err = new HttpError(message);
return Request.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.NotFound, err);
}
else
{
return Request.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.OK, item);
}
}
returns the following content to the browser when the item is not found:
HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found
Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2012 23:27:18 GMT
Content-Length: 51
{
"Message": "Product with id = 12 not found"
}
Suggestion: Don't throw HTTP Error 500 unless there is a catastrophic error (for example, WCF Fault Exception). Pick an appropriate HTTP status code that represents the state of your data. (See the apigee link below.)
Links:
- Exception Handling in ASP.NET Web API (asp.net) and
- RESTful API Design: what about errors? (apigee.com)
It looks like you're having more trouble with Validation than errors/exceptions so I'll say a bit about both.
Validation
Controller actions should generally take Input Models where the validation is declared directly on the model.
public class Customer
{
[Require]
public string Name { get; set; }
}
Then you can use an ActionFilter
that automatically sends validation messages back to the client.
public class ValidationActionFilter : ActionFilterAttribute
{
public override void OnActionExecuting(HttpActionContext actionContext)
{
var modelState = actionContext.ModelState;
if (!modelState.IsValid) {
actionContext.Response = actionContext.Request
.CreateErrorResponse(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest, modelState);
}
}
}
For more information about this check out http://ben.onfabrik.com/posts/automatic-modelstate-validation-in-aspnet-mvc
Error handling
It's best to return a message back to the client that represents the exception that happened (with relevant status code).
Out of the box you have to use Request.CreateErrorResponse(HttpStatusCode, message)
if you want to specify a message. However, this ties the code to the Request
object, which you shouldn't need to do.
I usually create my own type of "safe" exception that I expect the client would know how to handle and wrap all others with a generic 500 error.
Using an action filter to handle the exceptions would look like this:
public class ApiExceptionFilterAttribute : ExceptionFilterAttribute
{
public override void OnException(HttpActionExecutedContext context)
{
var exception = context.Exception as ApiException;
if (exception != null) {
context.Response = context.Request.CreateErrorResponse(exception.StatusCode, exception.Message);
}
}
}
Then you can register it globally.
GlobalConfiguration.Configuration.Filters.Add(new ApiExceptionFilterAttribute());
This is my custom exception type.
using System;
using System.Net;
namespace WebApi
{
public class ApiException : Exception
{
private readonly HttpStatusCode statusCode;
public ApiException (HttpStatusCode statusCode, string message, Exception ex)
: base(message, ex)
{
this.statusCode = statusCode;
}
public ApiException (HttpStatusCode statusCode, string message)
: base(message)
{
this.statusCode = statusCode;
}
public ApiException (HttpStatusCode statusCode)
{
this.statusCode = statusCode;
}
public HttpStatusCode StatusCode
{
get { return this.statusCode; }
}
}
}
An example exception that my API can throw.
public class NotAuthenticatedException : ApiException
{
public NotAuthenticatedException()
: base(HttpStatusCode.Forbidden)
{
}
}
For me I usually send back an HttpResponseException
and set the status code accordingly depending on the exception thrown and if the exception is fatal or not will determine whether I send back the HttpResponseException
immediately.
At the end of the day it's an API sending back responses and not views, so I think it's fine to send back a message with the exception and status code to the consumer. I currently haven't needed to accumulate errors and send them back as most exceptions are usually due to incorrect parameters or calls etc.
An example in my app is that sometimes the client will ask for data, but there isn't any data available so I throw a custom NoDataAvailableException
and let it bubble to the Web API app, where then in my custom filter which captures it sending back a relevant message along with the correct status code.
I am not 100% sure on what's the best practice for this, but this is working for me currently so that's what I'm doing.
Update:
Since I answered this question a few blog posts have been written on the topic:
https://weblogs.asp.net/fredriknormen/asp-net-web-api-exception-handling
(this one has some new features in the nightly builds) https://docs.microsoft.com/archive/blogs/youssefm/error-handling-in-asp-net-webapi
Update 2
Update to our error handling process, we have two cases:
For general errors like not found, or invalid parameters being passed to an action we return a
HttpResponseException
to stop processing immediately. Additionally for model errors in our actions we will hand the model state dictionary to theRequest.CreateErrorResponse
extension and wrap it in aHttpResponseException
. Adding the model state dictionary results in a list of the model errors sent in the response body.For errors that occur in higher layers, server errors, we let the exception bubble to the Web API app, here we have a global exception filter which looks at the exception, logs it with ELMAH and tries to make sense of it setting the correct HTTP status code and a relevant friendly error message as the body again in a
HttpResponseException
. For exceptions that we aren't expecting the client will receive the default 500 internal server error, but a generic message due to security reasons.
Update 3
Recently, after picking up Web API 2, for sending back general errors we now use the IHttpActionResult interface, specifically the built in classes for in the System.Web.Http.Results
namespace such as NotFound, BadRequest when they fit, if they don't we extend them, for example a NotFound result with a response message:
public class NotFoundWithMessageResult : IHttpActionResult
{
private string message;
public NotFoundWithMessageResult(string message)
{
this.message = message;
}
public Task<HttpResponseMessage> ExecuteAsync(CancellationToken cancellationToken)
{
var response = new HttpResponseMessage(HttpStatusCode.NotFound);
response.Content = new StringContent(message);
return Task.FromResult(response);
}
}