Dart null / false / empty checking: How to write this shorter?

I would write a helper function instead of doing everything inline.

bool isNullEmptyOrFalse(Object o) =>
  o == null || false == o || "" == o;

bool isNullEmptyFalseOrZero(Object o) =>
  o == null || false == o || 0 == o || "" == o;

That avoids the repeated lookup (like the contains operation), but it is much more readable. It also doesn't create a new List literal for each check (making the list const could fix that).

if (isNullEmptyOrFalse(routeinfo["no_route"])) { ... }

When struggling with making something short and readable, making a well-named helper function is usually the best solution.

(Addition: Now that Dart has extension methods, it's possible to add the functionality as methods or getters that are seemingly on the object, so you can write value.isNullOrEmpty directly).

You could do

if (["", null, false, 0].contains(routeinfo["no_route"])) {
  // do sth
}

Late 2020 Update

Summary

• This answer holds true, except for isNull and isNotNull. They no longer provide type promotion when Null Safety is introduced in dart/flutter in the future.
• Other helpers like isNullOrEmpty do not provide type promotion, as they are in a different (sub-)scope compared to callsite.
• My personal opinion, is that you can drop isNull and isNotNull but keep other helpers as you shouldn't expect them to do type promotion for you.

Explanation

• This is because Null Safety was finally introduced in Dart/Flutter. But as of October 2020, this feature is still not available for stable releases on dart/flutter. Check out the quick guide Null Safety or the thorough Understanding Null Safety.
• Null Safety in Dart/Flutter should be similar to Swift (Optional) and Kotlin (Nullable Types, Non-Nullable Types).

Demonstration

Here's a demonstration why encapsulation/helper-getter of isNull (== null) and isNotNull (!= null) is a very big problem:

// Promotion works
int definitelyInt(int? aNullableInt) {
  if (aNullableInt == null) { // Promote variable `aNullableInt` of Nullable type `int?` to Non-Nullable type `int`
    return 0;
  }
  return aNullableInt; // Can't be null! This variable is promoted to non-nullable type `int`
}

When "Null Safety" is shipped in the dart release you are using, the type promotion in above code works! HOWEVER:

// Promotion does NOT work!!!
int definitelyInt(int? aNullableInt) {
  if (aNullableInt.isNull) { // does NOT promote variable `aNullableInt` of Nullable type `int?`
    return 0;
  }
  return aNullableInt; // This variable is still of type `int?`!!!
}

The above doesn't work, because the null check == null and != null are encapsulated in a sub-scope (different stack frame) and not inferred to have this "promotion" effect within definitelyInt scope.

---

---

Early 2020 Update

Here's a modified version using getters instead of instance/class methods and covering whitespaces, isNull, and isNotNull.

Second Update

It also accounts for empty lists and maps now!

Third Update

Added private getters for safety and modularity/maintainability.

Fourth Update

Updated the answer to fix a particular problem with Map, it's not correctly being handled when empty! Because Map is not an Iterable. Solved this issue by introducing _isMapObjectEmpty U

Solution

extension TextUtilsStringExtension on String {
  /// Returns true if string is:
  /// - null
  /// - empty
  /// - whitespace string.
  ///
  /// Characters considered "whitespace" are listed [here](https://stackoverflow.com/a/59826129/10830091).
  bool get isNullEmptyOrWhitespace =>
      this == null || this.isEmpty || this.trim().isEmpty;
}

/// - [isNullOrEmpty], [isNullEmptyOrFalse], [isNullEmptyZeroOrFalse] are from [this StackOverflow answer](https://stackoverflow.com/a/59826129/10830091)
extension GeneralUtilsObjectExtension on Object {
  /// Returns true if object is:
  /// - null `Object`
  bool get isNull => this == null;

  /// Returns true if object is NOT:
  /// - null `Object`
  bool get isNotNull => this != null;

  /// Returns true if object is:
  /// - null `Object`
  /// - empty `String`s
  /// - empty `Iterable` (list, set, ...)
  /// - empty `Map`
  bool get isNullOrEmpty =>
      isNull ||
      _isStringObjectEmpty ||
      _isIterableObjectEmpty ||
      _isMapObjectEmpty;

  /// Returns true if object is:
  /// - null `Object`
  /// - empty `String`
  /// - empty `Iterable` (list, map, set, ...)
  /// - false `bool`
  bool get isNullEmptyOrFalse =>
      isNull ||
      _isStringObjectEmpty ||
      _isIterableObjectEmpty ||
      _isMapObjectEmpty ||
      _isBoolObjectFalse;

  /// Returns true if object is:
  /// - null `Object`
  /// - empty `String`
  /// - empty `Iterable` (list, map, set, ...)
  /// - false `bool`
  /// - zero `num`
  bool get isNullEmptyFalseOrZero =>
      isNull ||
      _isStringObjectEmpty ||
      _isIterableObjectEmpty ||
      _isMapObjectEmpty ||
      _isBoolObjectFalse ||
      _isNumObjectZero;

  // ------- PRIVATE EXTENSION HELPERS -------
  /// **Private helper**
  ///
  /// If `String` object, return String's method `isEmpty`
  ///
  /// Otherwise return `false` to not affect logical-OR expression. As `false` denotes undefined or N/A since object is not `String`
  bool get _isStringObjectEmpty =>
      (this is String) ? (this as String).isEmpty : false;

  /// **Private helper**
  ///
  /// If `Iterable` object, return Iterable's method `isEmpty`
  ///
  /// Otherwise return `false` to not affect logical-OR expression. As `false` denotes undefined or N/A since object is not `Iterable`
  bool get _isIterableObjectEmpty =>
      (this is Iterable) ? (this as Iterable).isEmpty : false;

  /// **Private helper**
  ///
  /// If `Map` object, return Map's method `isEmpty`
  ///
  /// Otherwise return `false` to not affect logical-OR expression. As `false` denotes undefined or N/A since object is not `Map`
  bool get _isMapObjectEmpty => (this is Map) ? (this as Map).isEmpty : false;

  /// **Private helper**
  ///
  /// If `bool` object, return `isFalse` expression
  ///
  /// Otherwise return `false` to not affect logical-OR expression. As `false` denotes undefined or N/A since object is not `bool`
  bool get _isBoolObjectFalse =>
      (this is bool) ? (this as bool) == false : false;

  /// **Private helper**
  ///
  /// If `num` object, return `isZero` expression
  ///
  /// Otherwise return `false` to not affect logical-OR expression. As `false` denotes undefined or N/A since object is not `num`
  bool get _isNumObjectZero => (this is num) ? (this as num) == 0 : false;
}

Assumptions

This presumes Dart 2.7 or above to support Extension Methods.

Usage

The above are two Extension classes. One for Object and one for String. Put them in a file separately/together and import the files/file at callsite file.

Description

Coming from Swift, I tend to use extensions like user @Benjamin Menrad's answer but with getter instead of method/function when applicable -- mirroring Dart's computed properties like String.isEmpty.

Coming from C#, I like their String's helper method IsNullOrWhiteSpace.

My version merges the above two concepts.

Naming

Rename the Extension classes whatever you like. I tend to name them like this:

XYExtension

Where:

• X is File/Author/App/Unique name.
• Y is name of Type being extended.

Name examples:

• MyAppIntExtension
• DartDoubleExtension
• TextUtilsStringExtension
• OHProviderExtension

Criticism

Why private getters instead of simple this == null || this == '' || this == [] || this == 0 || !this

• I think this is safer as it first casts the object to the right type we want to compare its value to.
• More modular as changes are central within the private getters and any modification is reflected everywhere.
• If type check fails within the private getter, we return false which doesn't affect the outcome of the root logical-OR expression.

If your requirement was simply empty or null (like mine when I saw this title in a search result), you can use Dart's safe navigation operator to make it a bit more terse:

if (routeinfo["no_route"]?.isEmpty ?? true) {
  // 
}

Where

• isEmpty checks for an empty String, but if routeinfo is null you can't call isEmpty on null, so we check for null with
• ?. safe navigation operator which will only call isEmpty when the object is not null and produce null otherwise. So we just need to check for null with
• ?? null coalescing operator

If your map is a nullable type then you have to safely navigate that:

if (routeinfo?["no_route"]?.isEmpty ?? true) {
  //
}