Academia - Dealing with "In my experience..." answers

There's nothing inherently wrong with questions that seek advice and wisdom from those who have more experience than themselves. And there's nothing wrong with sharing that wisdom here, if you can…

…back up your statements with constructive, sound reasoning.

But where these questions go wrong is when they become so generic as to stop soliciting hard-earned wisdom and veer towards simply polling the community.

The blog post Good Subjective, Bad Subjective should be required reading for this community.

The earmarks of bad subjective is when the answers fill with "I did this", "I did that", and "I did blah blah blah" responses. When answers don't even purport to explain why their solution is better than any other, it goes from being Q&A to just a poll of the community. Overly broad questions are just soliciting a collection of random answers. Folks will vote this stuff up, but it's just not good Q&A.

The Trouble with Popularity

It's a tough sell, but if you want this site to survive, you need a place where people are asking very interesting and challenging questions, not the uninspired poll questions that have all been asked 100 times before on every other site on the subject. If this site wants to rehash the same old conversations found in any random message forum, there's really no point in trying something different here.

If we can avoid questions that are simply asking, "Let's hear what everyone has to say about…", we can maintain the ideals of great Q&A in the face of completely subjective topics. This is especially true early in the beta when the site is new. The earliest questions on a site will set the tone and topic of the site for a long time.

I know I'm answering my own question, but I want to put forth the argument that these style answers should be acceptable on this SE. In my mind, this SE serves the purpose of transmitting the "lore" of Academia to aspiring graduate students, new graduate students, new faculty, and the like. Much of this lore is not "official", but it is highly useful nonetheless.

That being said, given that the answer to each question is likely going to vary significantly based on the particulars, I think we should customize the use of tags on this site to specify the particulars. Specifically, each question should have a tag that identifies the field of research; if none is there, the poster should be asked to provide one. This will always be relevant to the question; answers to a question about note-taking styles will be different for mathematics and history, for example. Additionally, we may want to consider asking for:

• BS/MA/PhD/postdoc/professorship
• country
• institution (not sure about this one)

I strongly think we should add some text on the "new question" page strongly suggesting that the poster includes tags for each of these, if relevant to the topic.

Many of my answers to advice questions tend to be of the "in my experience" category. For these questions, there is never enough information to be able to give a definitive correct answer. What we can do is give "in that case, I did X and the consequences were Y" type answers - then let the original poster determine which answer better fits their situation. Older folks have found that giving direct answers to questions to younger folks results in the advice getting ignored, so that more circumspect answers actually get listened to. As for your second link, I don't think that young folks understand just how much politics goes on in the real world.

What we do as a "community" will change over time. Some of the other sites here preferred such answers in the past, but now discourage them. This has lead me to quit visiting a number of other stack exchange sites.