Debugging core files generated on a Customer's box
What happens when a core file is generated from a Linux distro other than the one we are running in Dev? Is the stack trace even meaningful?
It the executable is dynamically linked, as yours is, the stack GDB produces will (most likely) not be meaningful.
The reason: GDB knows that your executable crashed by calling something in libc.so.6
at address 0x00454ff1
, but it doesn't know what code was at that address. So it looks into your copy of libc.so.6
and discovers that this is in select
, so it prints that.
But the chances that 0x00454ff1
is also in select in your customers copy of libc.so.6
are quite small. Most likely the customer had some other procedure at that address, perhaps abort
.
You can use disas select
, and observe that 0x00454ff1
is either in the middle of instruction, or that the previous instruction is not a CALL
. If either of these holds, your stack trace is meaningless.
You can however help yourself: you just need to get a copy of all libraries that are listed in (gdb) info shared
from the customer system. Have the customer tar them up with e.g.
cd /
tar cvzf to-you.tar.gz lib/libc.so.6 lib/ld-linux.so.2 ...
Then, on your system:
mkdir /tmp/from-customer
tar xzf to-you.tar.gz -C /tmp/from-customer
gdb /path/to/binary
(gdb) set solib-absolute-prefix /tmp/from-customer
(gdb) core core # Note: very important to set solib-... before loading core
(gdb) where # Get meaningful stack trace!
We then advice the Customer to run a -g binary so it becomes easier to debug.
A much better approach is:
- build with
-g -O2 -o myexe.dbg
strip -g myexe.dbg -o myexe
- distribute
myexe
to customers - when a customer gets a
core
, usemyexe.dbg
to debug it
You'll have full symbolic info (file/line, local variables), without having to ship a special binary to the customer, and without revealing too many details about your sources.
You can indeed get useful information from a crash dump, even one from an optimized compile (although it's what is called, technically, "a major pain in the ass.") a -g
compile is indeed better, and yes, you can do so even when the machine on which the dump happened is another distribution. Basically, with one caveat, all the important information is contained in the executable and ends up in the dump.
When you match the core file with the executable, the debugger will be able to tell you where the crash occurred and show you the stack. That in itself should help a lot. You should also find out as much as you can about the situation in which it happens -- can they reproduce it reliably? If so, can you reproduce it?
Now, here's the caveat: the place where the notion of "everything is there" breaks down is with shared object files, .so
files. If it is failing because of a problem with those, you won't have the symbol tables you need; you may only be able to see what library .so
it happens in.
There are a number of books about debugging, but I can't think of one I'd recommend.