Decrementing ranges in Haskell

Basically, because [10..1] is translated to enumFromTo 10 1 which itself has the semantics to create a list by taking all elements less-than 1 which result from counting upward (with step-size +1) from (including) 10.

Whereas [10, 9..1] is translated to enumFromToThen 10 9 1 which explicitly states the counting step-size as 9-10, i.e. -1 (which is hard-coded to +1 for enumFromTo)

A more accurate specification can be found in the Haskell Report (6.3.4 The Enum Class):

enumFrom       :: a -> [a]            -- [n..]
enumFromThen   :: a -> a -> [a]       -- [n,n'..]
enumFromTo     :: a -> a -> [a]       -- [n..m]
enumFromThenTo :: a -> a -> a -> [a]  -- [n,n'..m]

For the types Int and Integer, the enumeration functions have the following meaning:

• The sequence enumFrom e1 is the list [e1,e1+1,e1+2,...].

• The sequence enumFromThen e1 e2 is the list [e1,e1+i,e1+2i,...], where the increment, i, is e2-e1. The increment may be zero or negative. If the increment is zero, all the list elements are the same.

• The sequence enumFromTo e1 e3 is the list [e1,e1+1,e1+2,...e3]. The list is empty if e1 > e3.

• The sequence enumFromThenTo e1 e2 e3 is the list [e1,e1+i,e1+2i,...e3], where the increment, i, is e2-e1. If the increment is positive or zero, the list terminates when the next element would be greater than e3; the list is empty if e1 > e3. If the increment is negative, the list terminates when the next element would be less than e3; the list is empty if e1 < e3.

If you want to generate a list from a to b regardless of whether a < b, you can use the following:

[a, a + (signum $ b - a)..b]

Arithmetic sequence notation is just syntactic sugar for functions from the Enum class.

[a..]     = enumFrom a
[a..b]    = enumFromTo a b
[a, b..]  = enumFromThen a b
[a, b..c] = enumFromThenTo a b c

As for why they weren't defined to automatically reverse, I can only speculate but here are some possible reasons:

• If a and b are defined elsewhere, it would be harder to tell at a glance in which direction [a..b] would go.

• It has nicer mathematical properties to reason about. You don't have to add special cases for when the sequence would be reversed.