Difference between a user and a schema in Oracle?

I believe the problem is that Oracle uses the term schema slightly differently from what it generally means.

  1. Oracle's schema (as explained in Nebakanezer's answer): basically the set of all tables and other objects owned by a user account, so roughly equivalent to a user account
  2. Schema in general: The set of all tables, sprocs etc. that make up the database for a given system / application (as in "Developers should discuss with the DBAs about the schema for our new application.")

Schema in sense 2. is similar, but not the same as schema in sense 1. E.g. for an application that uses several DB accounts, a schema in sense 2 might consist of several Oracle schemas :-).

Plus schema can also mean a bunch of other, fairly unrelated things in other contexts (e.g. in mathematics).

Oracle should just have used a term like "userarea" or "accountobjects", instead of overloadin "schema"...


From Ask Tom

You should consider a schema to be the user account and collection of all objects therein as a schema for all intents and purposes.

SCOTT is a schema that includes the EMP, DEPT and BONUS tables with various grants, and other stuff.

SYS is a schema that includes tons of tables, views, grants, etc etc etc.

SYSTEM is a schema.....

Technically -- A schema is the set of metadata (data dictionary) used by the database, typically generated using DDL. A schema defines attributes of the database, such as tables, columns, and properties. A database schema is a description of the data in a database.

Tags:

Oracle