Differences between Collectors.toMap() and Collectors.groupingBy() to collect into a Map
TLDR :
To collect into a Map
that contains a single value by key (Map<MyKey,MyObject>
), use Collectors.toMap()
.
To collect into a Map
that contains multiple values by key (Map<MyKey, List<MyObject>>
), use Collectors.groupingBy()
.
Collectors.toMap()
By writing :
chargePoints.stream().collect(Collectors.toMap(Point::getParentId, c -> c));
The returned object will have the Map<Long,Point>
type.
Look at the Collectors.toMap()
function that you are using :
Collector<T, ?, Map<K,U>> toMap(Function<? super T, ? extends K> keyMapper,
Function<? super T, ? extends U> valueMapper)
It returns a Collector
with as result Map<K,U>
where K
and U
are the type of return of the two functions passed to the method.
In your case, Point::getParentId
is a Long and c
refers to a Point
.
Whereas the Map<Long,Point>
returned when collect()
is applied on.
And this behavior is rather expected as Collectors.toMap() javadoc states :
returns a
Collector
that accumulates elements into aMap
whose keys and values are the result of applying the provided mapping functions to the input elements.
But if the mapped keys contains duplicates (according to Object.equals(Object)
), an IllegalStateException
is thrown
It will be probably your case as you will group the Point
s according to a specific property : parentId
.
If the mapped keys may have duplicates, you could use the toMap(Function, Function, BinaryOperator)
overload but it will not really solve your problem as it will not group elements with the same parentId
. It will just provide a way to not have two elements with the same parentId
.
Collectors.groupingBy()
To achieve your requirement, you should use Collectors.groupingBy()
which the behavior and the method declaration suits much better to your need :
public static <T, K> Collector<T, ?, Map<K, List<T>>>
groupingBy(Function<? super T, ? extends K> classifier)
It is specified as :
Returns a Collector implementing a "group by" operation on input elements of type T, grouping elements according to a classification function, and returning the results in a Map.
The method takes a Function
.
In your case, the Function
parameter is Point
(the type
of Stream) and you return Point.getParentId()
as you want to group elements by parentId
values.
So you could write :
Map<Long, List<Point>> pointByParentId =
chargePoints.stream()
.collect(Collectors.groupingBy( p -> p.getParentId()));
Or with a method reference :
Map<Long, List<Point>> pointByParentId =
chargePoints.stream()
.collect(Collectors.groupingBy(Point::getParentId));
Collectors.groupingBy() : go further
Indeed the groupingBy()
collector goes further than the actual example.
The Collectors.groupingBy(Function<? super T, ? extends K> classifier)
method is finally just a convenient method to store the values of the collected Map
in a List
.
To store values of the Map
in another thing than a List
or to store the result of a specific computation , groupingBy(Function<? super T, ? extends K> classifier, Collector<? super T, A, D> downstream)
should interest you.
For example :
Map<Long, Set<Point>> pointByParentId =
chargePoints.stream()
.collect(Collectors.groupingBy(Point::getParentId, toSet()));
So beyond the asked question, you should consider groupingBy()
as a flexible way to choose values that you want to store into the collected Map
, what definitively toMap()
is not.
Collectors.groupingBy
is exactly what you want, it creates a Map from your input collection, creating an Entry using the Function
you provide for it's key, and a List of Points with your associated key as it's value.
Map<Long, List<Point>> pointByParentId = chargePoints.stream()
.collect(Collectors.groupingBy(Point::getParentId));
The following code does the stuff. Collectors.toList()
is the default one, so you can skip it, but in case you want to have Map<Long, Set<Point>>
Collectors.toSet()
would be needed.
Map<Long, List<Point>> map = pointList.stream()
.collect(Collectors.groupingBy(Point::getParentId, Collectors.toList()));