Dynamically evaluate expression from formula in pandas?
You can use 1) pd.eval()
, 2) df.query()
, or 3) df.eval()
. Their various features and functionality are discussed below.
Examples will involve these dataframes (unless otherwise specified).
np.random.seed(0)
df1 = pd.DataFrame(np.random.choice(10, (5, 4)), columns=list('ABCD'))
df2 = pd.DataFrame(np.random.choice(10, (5, 4)), columns=list('ABCD'))
df3 = pd.DataFrame(np.random.choice(10, (5, 4)), columns=list('ABCD'))
df4 = pd.DataFrame(np.random.choice(10, (5, 4)), columns=list('ABCD'))
1) pandas.eval
This is the "Missing Manual" that pandas doc should contain. Note: of the three functions being discussed,
pd.eval
is the most important.df.eval
anddf.query
callpd.eval
under the hood. Behaviour and usage is more or less consistent across the three functions, with some minor semantic variations which will be highlighted later. This section will introduce functionality that is common across all the three functions - this includes, (but not limited to) allowed syntax, precedence rules, and keyword arguments.
pd.eval
can evaluate arithmetic expressions which can consist of variables and/or literals. These expressions must be passed as strings. So, to answer the question as stated, you can do
x = 5
pd.eval("df1.A + (df1.B * x)")
Some things to note here:
- The entire expression is a string
df1
,df2
, andx
refer to variables in the global namespace, these are picked up byeval
when parsing the expression- Specific columns are accessed using the attribute accessor index. You can also use
"df1['A'] + (df1['B'] * x)"
to the same effect.
I will be addressing the specific issue of reassignment in the section explaining the target=...
attribute below. But for now, here are more simple examples of valid operations with pd.eval
:
pd.eval("df1.A + df2.A") # Valid, returns a pd.Series object
pd.eval("abs(df1) ** .5") # Valid, returns a pd.DataFrame object
...and so on. Conditional expressions are also supported in the same way. The statements below are all valid expressions and will be evaluated by the engine.
pd.eval("df1 > df2")
pd.eval("df1 > 5")
pd.eval("df1 < df2 and df3 < df4")
pd.eval("df1 in [1, 2, 3]")
pd.eval("1 < 2 < 3")
A list detailing all the supported features and syntax can be found in the documentation. In summary,
- Arithmetic operations except for the left shift (
<<
) and right shift (>>
) operators, e.g.,df + 2 * pi / s ** 4 % 42
- the_golden_ratio- Comparison operations, including chained comparisons, e.g.,
2 < df < df2
- Boolean operations, e.g.,
df < df2 and df3 < df4
ornot df_bool
list
andtuple
literals, e.g.,[1, 2]
or(1, 2)
- Attribute access, e.g.,
df.a
- Subscript expressions, e.g.,
df[0]
- Simple variable evaluation, e.g.,
pd.eval('df')
(this is not very useful)- Math functions: sin, cos, exp, log, expm1, log1p, sqrt, sinh, cosh, tanh, arcsin, arccos, arctan, arccosh, arcsinh, arctanh, abs and arctan2.
This section of the documentation also specifies syntax rules that are not supported, including set
/dict
literals, if-else statements, loops, and comprehensions, and generator expressions.
From the list, it is obvious you can also pass expressions involving the index, such as
pd.eval('df1.A * (df1.index > 1)')
1a) Parser Selection: The parser=...
argument
pd.eval
supports two different parser options when parsing the expression string to generate the syntax tree: pandas
and python
. The main difference between the two is highlighted by slightly differing precedence rules.
Using the default parser pandas
, the overloaded bitwise operators &
and |
which implement vectorized AND and OR operations with pandas objects will have the same operator precedence as and
and or
. So,
pd.eval("(df1 > df2) & (df3 < df4)")
Will be the same as
pd.eval("df1 > df2 & df3 < df4")
# pd.eval("df1 > df2 & df3 < df4", parser='pandas')
And also the same as
pd.eval("df1 > df2 and df3 < df4")
Here, the parentheses are necessary. To do this conventionally, the parens would be required to override the higher precedence of bitwise operators:
(df1 > df2) & (df3 < df4)
Without that, we end up with
df1 > df2 & df3 < df4
ValueError: The truth value of a DataFrame is ambiguous. Use a.empty, a.bool(), a.item(), a.any() or a.all().
Use parser='python'
if you want to maintain consistency with python's actual operator precedence rules while evaluating the string.
pd.eval("(df1 > df2) & (df3 < df4)", parser='python')
The other difference between the two types of parsers are the semantics of the ==
and !=
operators with list and tuple nodes, which have the similar semantics as in
and not in
respectively, when using the 'pandas'
parser. For example,
pd.eval("df1 == [1, 2, 3]")
Is valid, and will run with the same semantics as
pd.eval("df1 in [1, 2, 3]")
OTOH, pd.eval("df1 == [1, 2, 3]", parser='python')
will throw a NotImplementedError
error.
1b) Backend Selection: The engine=...
argument
There are two options - numexpr
(the default) and python
. The numexpr
option uses the numexpr backend which is optimized for performance.
With 'python'
backend, your expression is evaluated similar to just passing the expression to python's eval
function. You have the flexibility of doing more inside expressions, such as string operations, for instance.
df = pd.DataFrame({'A': ['abc', 'def', 'abacus']})
pd.eval('df.A.str.contains("ab")', engine='python')
0 True
1 False
2 True
Name: A, dtype: bool
Unfortunately, this method offers no performance benefits over the numexpr
engine, and there are very few security measures to ensure that dangerous expressions are not evaluated, so USE AT YOUR OWN RISK! It is generally not recommended to change this option to 'python'
unless you know what you're doing.
1c) local_dict
and global_dict
arguments
Sometimes, it is useful to supply values for variables used inside expressions, but not currently defined in your namespace. You can pass a dictionary to local_dict
For example:
pd.eval("df1 > thresh")
UndefinedVariableError: name 'thresh' is not defined
This fails because thresh
is not defined. However, this works:
pd.eval("df1 > thresh", local_dict={'thresh': 10})
This is useful when you have variables to supply from a dictionary. Alternatively, with the 'python'
engine, you could simply do this:
mydict = {'thresh': 5}
# Dictionary values with *string* keys cannot be accessed without
# using the 'python' engine.
pd.eval('df1 > mydict["thresh"]', engine='python')
But this is going to possibly be much slower than using the 'numexpr'
engine and passing a dictionary to local_dict
or global_dict
. Hopefully, this should make a convincing argument for the use of these parameters.
1d) The target
(+ inplace
) argument, and Assignment Expressions
This is not often a requirement because there are usually simpler ways of doing this, but you can assign the result of pd.eval
to an object that implements __getitem__
such as dict
s, and (you guessed it) DataFrames.
Consider the example in the question
x = 5 df2['D'] = df1['A'] + (df1['B'] * x)
To assign a column "D" to df2
, we do
pd.eval('D = df1.A + (df1.B * x)', target=df2)
A B C D
0 5 9 8 5
1 4 3 0 52
2 5 0 2 22
3 8 1 3 48
4 3 7 0 42
This is not an in-place modification of df2
(but it can be... read on). Consider another example:
pd.eval('df1.A + df2.A')
0 10
1 11
2 7
3 16
4 10
dtype: int32
If you wanted to (for example) assign this back to a DataFrame, you could use the target
argument as follows:
df = pd.DataFrame(columns=list('FBGH'), index=df1.index)
df
F B G H
0 NaN NaN NaN NaN
1 NaN NaN NaN NaN
2 NaN NaN NaN NaN
3 NaN NaN NaN NaN
4 NaN NaN NaN NaN
df = pd.eval('B = df1.A + df2.A', target=df)
# Similar to
# df = df.assign(B=pd.eval('df1.A + df2.A'))
df
F B G H
0 NaN 10 NaN NaN
1 NaN 11 NaN NaN
2 NaN 7 NaN NaN
3 NaN 16 NaN NaN
4 NaN 10 NaN NaN
If you wanted to perform an in-place mutation on df
, set inplace=True
.
pd.eval('B = df1.A + df2.A', target=df, inplace=True)
# Similar to
# df['B'] = pd.eval('df1.A + df2.A')
df
F B G H
0 NaN 10 NaN NaN
1 NaN 11 NaN NaN
2 NaN 7 NaN NaN
3 NaN 16 NaN NaN
4 NaN 10 NaN NaN
If inplace
is set without a target, a ValueError
is raised.
While the target
argument is fun to play around with, you will seldom need to use it.
If you wanted to do this with df.eval
, you would use an expression involving an assignment:
df = df.eval("B = @df1.A + @df2.A")
# df.eval("B = @df1.A + @df2.A", inplace=True)
df
F B G H
0 NaN 10 NaN NaN
1 NaN 11 NaN NaN
2 NaN 7 NaN NaN
3 NaN 16 NaN NaN
4 NaN 10 NaN NaN
Note
One of pd.eval
's unintended uses is parsing literal strings in a manner very similar to ast.literal_eval
:
pd.eval("[1, 2, 3]")
array([1, 2, 3], dtype=object)
It can also parse nested lists with the 'python'
engine:
pd.eval("[[1, 2, 3], [4, 5], [10]]", engine='python')
[[1, 2, 3], [4, 5], [10]]
And lists of strings:
pd.eval(["[1, 2, 3]", "[4, 5]", "[10]"], engine='python')
[[1, 2, 3], [4, 5], [10]]
The problem, however, is for lists with length larger than 100:
pd.eval(["[1]"] * 100, engine='python') # Works
pd.eval(["[1]"] * 101, engine='python')
AttributeError: 'PandasExprVisitor' object has no attribute 'visit_Ellipsis'
More information can this error, causes, fixes, and workarounds can be found here.
2) DataFrame.eval
:
As mentioned above, df.eval
calls pd.eval
under the hood, with a bit of juxtaposition of arguments. The v0.23 source code shows this:
def eval(self, expr, inplace=False, **kwargs):
from pandas.core.computation.eval import eval as _eval
inplace = validate_bool_kwarg(inplace, 'inplace')
resolvers = kwargs.pop('resolvers', None)
kwargs['level'] = kwargs.pop('level', 0) + 1
if resolvers is None:
index_resolvers = self._get_index_resolvers()
resolvers = dict(self.iteritems()), index_resolvers
if 'target' not in kwargs:
kwargs['target'] = self
kwargs['resolvers'] = kwargs.get('resolvers', ()) + tuple(resolvers)
return _eval(expr, inplace=inplace, **kwargs)
eval
creates arguments, does a little validation, and passes the arguments on to pd.eval
.
For more, you can read on: when to use DataFrame.eval() versus pandas.eval() or python eval()
2a) Usage Differences
2a1) Expressions with DataFrames vs. Series Expressions
For dynamic queries associated with entire DataFrames, you should prefer pd.eval
. For example, there is no simple way to specify the equivalent of pd.eval("df1 + df2")
when you call df1.eval
or df2.eval
.
2a2) Specifying Column Names
Another other major difference is how columns are accessed. For example, to add two columns "A" and "B" in df1
, you would call pd.eval
with the following expression:
pd.eval("df1.A + df1.B")
With df.eval, you need only supply the column names:
df1.eval("A + B")
Since, within the context of df1
, it is clear that "A" and "B" refer to column names.
You can also refer to the index and columns using index
(unless the index is named, in which case you would use the name).
df1.eval("A + index")
Or, more generally, for any DataFrame with an index having 1 or more levels, you can refer to the kth level of the index in an expression using the variable "ilevel_k" which stands for "index at level k". IOW, the expression above can be written as df1.eval("A + ilevel_0")
.
These rules also apply to df.query
.
2a3) Accessing Variables in Local/Global Namespace
Variables supplied inside expressions must be preceeded by the "@" symbol, to avoid confusion with column names.
A = 5
df1.eval("A > @A")
The same goes for query
.
It goes without saying that your column names must follow the rules for valid identifier naming in python to be accessible inside eval
. See here for a list of rules on naming identifiers.
2a4) Multiline Queries and Assignment
A little known fact is that eval
supports multiline expressions that deal with assignment (whereas query
doesn't). For example, to create two new columns "E" and "F" in df1 based on some arithmetic operations on some columns, and a third column "G" based on the previously created "E" and "F", we can do
df1.eval("""
E = A + B
F = @df2.A + @df2.B
G = E >= F
""")
A B C D E F G
0 5 0 3 3 5 14 False
1 7 9 3 5 16 7 True
2 2 4 7 6 6 5 True
3 8 8 1 6 16 9 True
4 7 7 8 1 14 10 True
3) eval
vs query
It helps to think of df.query
as a function that uses pd.eval
as a subroutine.
Typically, query
(as the name suggests) is used to evaluate conditional expressions (i.e., expressions that result in True/False values) and return the rows corresponding to the True
result. The result of the expression is then passed to loc
(in most cases) to return the rows that satisfy the expression. According to the documentation,
The result of the evaluation of this expression is first passed to
DataFrame.loc
and if that fails because of a multidimensional key (e.g., a DataFrame) then the result will be passed toDataFrame.__getitem__()
.This method uses the top-level
pandas.eval()
function to evaluate the passed query.
In terms of similarity, query
and df.eval
are both alike in how they access column names and variables.
This key difference between the two, as mentioned above is how they handle the expression result. This becomes obvious when you actually run an expression through these two functions. For example, consider
df1.A
0 5
1 7
2 2
3 8
4 7
Name: A, dtype: int32
df1.B
0 9
1 3
2 0
3 1
4 7
Name: B, dtype: int32
To get all rows where "A" >= "B" in df1
, we would use eval
like this:
m = df1.eval("A >= B")
m
0 True
1 False
2 False
3 True
4 True
dtype: bool
m
represents the intermediate result generated by evaluating the expression "A >= B". We then use the mask to filter df1
:
df1[m]
# df1.loc[m]
A B C D
0 5 0 3 3
3 8 8 1 6
4 7 7 8 1
However, with query
, the intermediate result "m" is directly passed to loc
, so with query
, you would simply need to do
df1.query("A >= B")
A B C D
0 5 0 3 3
3 8 8 1 6
4 7 7 8 1
Performance wise, it is exactly the same.
df1_big = pd.concat([df1] * 100000, ignore_index=True)
%timeit df1_big[df1_big.eval("A >= B")]
%timeit df1_big.query("A >= B")
14.7 ms ± 33.9 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
14.7 ms ± 24.3 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 100 loops each)
But the latter is more concise, and expresses the same operation in a single step.
Note that you can also do weird stuff with query
like this (to, say, return all rows indexed by df1.index)
df1.query("index")
# Same as df1.loc[df1.index] # Pointless,... I know
A B C D
0 5 0 3 3
1 7 9 3 5
2 2 4 7 6
3 8 8 1 6
4 7 7 8 1
But don't.
Bottom line: Please use query
when querying or filtering rows based on a conditional expression.
Great tutorial already, but bear in mind that before jumping wildly into the usage of eval/query
attracted by its simpler syntax, it has severe performance issues if your dataset has less than 15,000 rows.
In that case, simply use df.loc[mask1, mask2]
.
Refer: https://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/version/0.22/enhancingperf.html#enhancingperf-eval