Failed to configure a DataSource: 'url' attribute is not specified and no embedded datasource could be configured
check your application.properties
changing
spring.datasource.driverClassName=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver
to
spring.datasource.driver-class-name=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver
worked for me. Full config:
spring.datasource.url=jdbc:mysql://localhost:3306/db
spring.datasource.username=
spring.datasource.password=
spring.datasource.driver-class-name=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver
spring.jpa.database-platform = org.hibernate.dialect.MySQL5Dialect
spring.jpa.generate-ddl=true
spring.jpa.hibernate.ddl-auto = update
Just add : @SpringBootApplication(exclude = {DataSourceAutoConfiguration.class })
works for me.
I was getting same error I tried with @EnableAutoConfiguration(exclude=...)
didn't work.
Your problem is the dependency of spring batch spring-boot-starter-batch
that has a spring-boot-starter-jdbc
transitive maven dependency.
Spring Batch is a framework for building reliable and fault tolerance enterprise batch jobs. It supports many features like restarting a failed batch, recording the status of the batch execution and so on. In order to achieve that Spring Batch uses a database schema to store the status of the registered jobs, the auto-configuration already provides you the basic configuration of the required data source and it is this configuration that requires the relational database configuration.
To solve this you must include some database driver like mysql
, h2
, etc. to configure the url
.
Update: Just for getting start you can configure your application.yml like below:
spring:
datasource:
driver-class-name: org.h2.Driver
url: jdbc:h2:mem:localhost;DB_CLOSE_ON_EXIT=FALSE
username: admin
password:
and of course in your pom.xml
include the h2 dirver like this:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd">
<modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion>
<groupId>com.example</groupId>
<artifactId>demo</artifactId>
<version>0.0.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
<packaging>jar</packaging>
<name>demo</name>
<description>Demo project for Spring Boot</description>
<parent>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-parent</artifactId>
<version>2.0.3.RELEASE</version>
<relativePath/> <!-- lookup parent from repository -->
</parent>
<properties>
<project.build.sourceEncoding>UTF-8</project.build.sourceEncoding>
<project.reporting.outputEncoding>UTF-8</project.reporting.outputEncoding>
<java.version>1.8</java.version>
</properties>
<dependencies>
....
<dependency>
<groupId>com.h2database</groupId>
<artifactId>h2</artifactId>
</dependency>
....
</dependencies>
...
</project>
The motivation, because you can not use mongo for this purpose, is that the usage of mongo is provided only for item readers and writers and not for managing the internal database of Spring Batch that is an internal schema, not a business schema. The query is plain SQL query and the internal abstraction relies on a relational database. It is necessary to have a database with ACID capability because every batch reads and writes a chunk of work and saves that information in order to restart the job. A NoSql solution is not suitable for this.
At the end you have configured a relational database in order to prepare Spring Batch for internal capability, the internal abstraction does not rely on mongo only on jdbc. Then mongo can be used but for the business side of the batch via item reader/writer.
I hope that this can help you to clear your doubts.