How do I await multiple promises in-parallel without 'fail-fast' behavior?

While the technique in the accepted answer can solve your issue, it's an anti-pattern. Resolving a promise with an error isn't good practice and there is a cleaner way of doing this.

What you want to do, in pseudo-code, is:

fn task() {
  result-1 = doAsync();
  result-n = doAsync();

  // handle results together
  return handleResults(result-1, ..., result-n)
}

This can be achieved simply with async/await without the need to use Promise.all. A working example:

console.clear();

function wait(ms, data) {
  return new Promise( resolve => setTimeout(resolve.bind(this, data), ms) );
}

/** 
 * These will be run in series, because we call
 * a function and immediately wait for each result, 
 * so this will finish in 1s.
 */
async function series() {
  return {
    result1: await wait(500, 'seriesTask1'),
    result2: await wait(500, 'seriesTask2'),
  }
}

/** 
 * While here we call the functions first,
 * then wait for the result later, so 
 * this will finish in 500ms.
 */
async function parallel() {
  const task1 = wait(500, 'parallelTask1');
  const task2 = wait(500, 'parallelTask2');

  return {
    result1: await task1,
    result2: await task2,
  }
}

async function taskRunner(fn, label) {
  const startTime = performance.now();
  console.log(`Task ${label} starting...`);
  let result = await fn();
  console.log(`Task ${label} finished in ${ Number.parseInt(performance.now() - startTime) } miliseconds with,`, result);
}

void taskRunner(series, 'series');
void taskRunner(parallel, 'parallel');

Note: You will need a browser which has async/await enabled to run this snippet.

This way you can use simply try/ catch to handle your errors, and return partial results inside parallel function.


ES2020 contains Promise.allSettled, which will do what you want.

Promise.allSettled([
    Promise.resolve('a'),
    Promise.reject('b')
]).then(console.log)

Output:

[
  {
    "status": "fulfilled",
    "value": "a"
  },
  {
    "status": "rejected",
    "reason": "b"
  }
]

But if you want to "roll your own", then you can leverage the fact that using Promise#catch means that the promise resolves (unless you throw an exception from the catch or manually reject the promise chain), so you do not need to explicitly return a resolved promise.

So, by simply handling errors with catch, you can achieve what you want.

Note that if you want the errors to be visible in the result, you will have to decide on a convention for surfacing them.

You can apply a rejection handling function to each promise in a collection using Array#map, and use Promise.all to wait for all of them to complete.

Example

The following should print out:

Elapsed Time   Output

     0         started...
     1s        foo completed
     1s        bar completed
     2s        bam errored
     2s        done [
                   "foo result",
                   "bar result",
                   {
                       "error": "bam"
                   }
               ]

async function foo() {
    await new Promise((r)=>setTimeout(r,1000))
    console.log('foo completed')
    return 'foo result'
}

async function bar() {
    await new Promise((r)=>setTimeout(r,1000))
    console.log('bar completed')
    return 'bar result'
}

async function bam() {
    try {
        await new Promise((_,reject)=>setTimeout(reject,2000))
    } catch {
        console.log('bam errored')
        throw 'bam'
    }
}

function handleRejection(p) {
    return p.catch((error)=>({
        error
    }))
}

function waitForAll(...ps) {
    console.log('started...')
    return Promise.all(ps.map(handleRejection))
}

waitForAll(foo(), bar(), bam()).then(results=>console.log('done', results))

See also.