How good is startswith?
Personally I would say startswith
is more readable.
Also, from Python 2.5 startwith
can take a tuple of prefixes to look for:
>>> "hello world".startswith(("hello","goodbye"))
True
Yes: it’s easier to use and easier to read. When you are testing for more than one letter, when using slicing, you’ll have to know how long the target text is:
haystack = 'Hello, World!'
needle = 'Hello'
# The easy way
result = haystack.startswith(needle)
# The slightly harder way
result = haystack[:len(needle)] == needle
Edit: The question seems to have changed. It now says, “knowing text is not empty and we are only interested in the first character of it.” That turns it into a fairly meaningless hypothetical situation.
I suspect the questioner is trying to “optimize” his/her code for execution speed. If that is the case, my answer is: don’t. Use whichever form is more readable and, therefore, more maintainable when you have to come back and work on it a year from now. Only optimize if profiling shows that line of code to be the bottleneck. This is not some O(n²) algorithm. It’s a string comparison.
I'd agree with the others that startswith is more readable, and you should use that. That said, if performance is a big issue for such a special case, benchmark it:
$ python -m timeit -s 'text="foo"' 'text.startswith("a")'
1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.537 usec per loop
$ python -m timeit -s 'text="foo"' 'text[0]=="a"'
1000000 loops, best of 3: 0.22 usec per loop
So text[0]
is amost 2.5 times as fast - but it's a pretty quick operation; you'd save ~0.3 microseconds per compare depending on the system. Unless you're doing millions of comparisons in a time critical situation though, I'd still go with the more readable startswith.
text[0]
fails if text
is an empty string:
IronPython 2.6 Alpha (2.6.0.1) on .NET 4.0.20506.1
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> text = ""
>>> print(text.startswith("a"))
False
>>> print(text[0]=='a')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
IndexError: index out of range: 0
EDIT: You say you "know" that text
is not empty... how confident are you of that, and what would you want to happen if it is empty in reality? If a failure is appropriate (e.g. it means a bug in your code) that would encourage the use of text[0]=='a'
.
Other questions:
How concerned are you about the performance of this? If this is performance critical, then benchmark it on your particular Python runtime. I wouldn't be entirely surprised to find that (say) one form was faster on IronPython and a different one faster on CPython.
Which do you (and your team) find more readable?