How memset initializes an array of integers by -1?
When all bits of a number are 0
, its value is also 0. However, if all bits are 1
the value is -1.
If we write int a[2]
, 4x2 bytes of memory is allocated which contains random/garbage bits-
00110000 00100101 11100011 11110010 11110101 10001001 00111000 00010001
Then, we write memset(a, 0, sizeof(a))
. Now, memset()
works byte by byte, and one byte representation (unsigned char
) of 0 is 00000000
. So, it becomes-
00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
Therefore, both a[0]
and a[1]
are initialized with 0.
Now, lets see memset(a, -1, sizeof(a))
: one byte for -1 is 11111111
. And, we get-
11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111 11111111
Here, both a[0]
and a[1]
will have the value -1.
However, for memset(a, 1, sizeof(a))
: 1 in a byte is 00000001
-
00000001 00000001 00000001 00000001 00000001 00000001 00000001 00000001
So, the value will be- 16843009.
Oddly, the reason this works with -1
is exactly the same as the reason that this works with zeros: in two's complement binary representation, -1
has 1
s in all its bits, regardless of the size of the integer, so filling in a region with bytes filled with all 1
s produces a region of -1
signed int
s, long
s, and short
s on two's complement hardware.
On hardware that differs from two's complement the result will be different. The -1
integer constant would be converted to an unsigned char
of all ones, because the standard is specific on how the conversion has to be performed. However, a region of bytes with all their bits set to 1
would be interpreted as integral values in accordance with the rules of the platform. For example, on sign-and-magnitude hardware all elements of your array would contain the smallest negative value of the corresponding type.