How to determine if a linear system is solvable
Yes: by showing that the system is equivalent to one in which the equation $0=3$ must hold, you have shown the original system has no solutions.
By definition, a system of linear equation is said to be "consistent" if and only if it has at least one solution; and it is "inconsistent" if and only if it has no solutions. So "showing a system of linear equations is not solvable" (has no solutions) is, by definition, the same thing as showing that the system of linear equations is "inconsistent".
"A system doesn't have a unique solution" can happen in two ways: it can have more than one solution (in which case it has infinitely many solutions), or it can have no solutions. Only in the second case do we say the system is "inconsistent".
One of the easiest ways to find solutions of systems of linear equations (or show no solutions exist) is Gauss (or Gauss-Jordan) Row Reduction; it amounts to doing the kind of things you did, but in a systematic, algorithmic, recipe-like manner. You can do it almost mindlessly (or you can keep an eye out for clever actions that may save you work down the line). This process will determine, after a finite number of steps, whether the system is consistent or not, and in the case that the system is consistent, will tell you what the solutions are.
The idea of the row operations is that the solutions, if any, after the operations are exactly the same as the solutions, if any, before the operations. If, after the operations, you get to an equation like $0=3$, that is, to an equation that obviously has no solutions, then you deduce that your original system had no solutions. And if your original system has no solutions, then a systematic application of row operations will pretty quickly get you to an equation like $0=3$.