Apply several summary functions on several variables by group in one call

You can do it all in one step and get proper labeling:

> aggregate(. ~ id1+id2, data = x, FUN = function(x) c(mn = mean(x), n = length(x) ) )
#   id1 id2 val1.mn val1.n val2.mn val2.n
# 1   a   x     1.5    2.0     6.5    2.0
# 2   b   x     2.0    2.0     8.0    2.0
# 3   a   y     3.5    2.0     7.0    2.0
# 4   b   y     3.0    2.0     6.0    2.0

This creates a dataframe with two id columns and two matrix columns:

str( aggregate(. ~ id1+id2, data = x, FUN = function(x) c(mn = mean(x), n = length(x) ) ) )
'data.frame':   4 obs. of  4 variables:
 $ id1 : Factor w/ 2 levels "a","b": 1 2 1 2
 $ id2 : Factor w/ 2 levels "x","y": 1 1 2 2
 $ val1: num [1:4, 1:2] 1.5 2 3.5 3 2 2 2 2
  ..- attr(*, "dimnames")=List of 2
  .. ..$ : NULL
  .. ..$ : chr  "mn" "n"
 $ val2: num [1:4, 1:2] 6.5 8 7 6 2 2 2 2
  ..- attr(*, "dimnames")=List of 2
  .. ..$ : NULL
  .. ..$ : chr  "mn" "n"

As pointed out by @lord.garbage below, this can be converted to a dataframe with "simple" columns by using do.call(data.frame, ...)

str( do.call(data.frame, aggregate(. ~ id1+id2, data = x, FUN = function(x) c(mn = mean(x), n = length(x) ) ) ) 
    )
'data.frame':   4 obs. of  6 variables:
 $ id1    : Factor w/ 2 levels "a","b": 1 2 1 2
 $ id2    : Factor w/ 2 levels "x","y": 1 1 2 2
 $ val1.mn: num  1.5 2 3.5 3
 $ val1.n : num  2 2 2 2
 $ val2.mn: num  6.5 8 7 6
 $ val2.n : num  2 2 2 2

This is the syntax for multiple variables on the LHS:

aggregate(cbind(val1, val2) ~ id1 + id2, data = x, FUN = function(x) c(mn = mean(x), n = length(x) ) )

You could add a count column, aggregate with sum, then scale back to get the mean:

x$count <- 1
agg <- aggregate(. ~ id1 + id2, data = x,FUN = sum)
agg
#   id1 id2 val1 val2 count
# 1   a   x    3   13     2
# 2   b   x    4   16     2
# 3   a   y    7   14     2
# 4   b   y    6   12     2

agg[c("val1", "val2")] <- agg[c("val1", "val2")] / agg$count
agg
#   id1 id2 val1 val2 count
# 1   a   x  1.5  6.5     2
# 2   b   x  2.0  8.0     2
# 3   a   y  3.5  7.0     2
# 4   b   y  3.0  6.0     2

It has the advantage of preserving your column names and creating a single count column.


Using the dplyr package you could achieve this by using summarise_all. With this summarise-function you can apply other functions (in this case mean and n()) to each of the non-grouping columns:

x %>%
  group_by(id1, id2) %>%
  summarise_all(funs(mean, n()))

which gives:

     id1    id2 val1_mean val2_mean val1_n val2_n
1      a      x       1.5       6.5      2      2
2      a      y       3.5       7.0      2      2
3      b      x       2.0       8.0      2      2
4      b      y       3.0       6.0      2      2

If you don't want to apply the function(s) to all non-grouping columns, you specify the columns to which they should be applied or by excluding the non-wanted with a minus using the summarise_at() function:

# inclusion
x %>%
  group_by(id1, id2) %>%
  summarise_at(vars(val1, val2), funs(mean, n()))

# exclusion
x %>%
  group_by(id1, id2) %>%
  summarise_at(vars(-val2), funs(mean, n()))

Given this in the question :

I could use the plyr package, but my data set is quite large and plyr is very slow (almost unusable) when the size of the dataset grows.

Then in data.table (1.9.4+) you could try :

> DT
   id1 id2 val1 val2
1:   a   x    1    9
2:   a   x    2    4
3:   a   y    3    5
4:   a   y    4    9
5:   b   x    1    7
6:   b   y    4    4
7:   b   x    3    9
8:   b   y    2    8

> DT[ , .(mean(val1), mean(val2), .N), by = .(id1, id2)]   # simplest
   id1 id2  V1  V2 N
1:   a   x 1.5 6.5 2
2:   a   y 3.5 7.0 2
3:   b   x 2.0 8.0 2
4:   b   y 3.0 6.0 2

> DT[ , .(val1.m = mean(val1), val2.m = mean(val2), count = .N), by = .(id1, id2)]  # named
   id1 id2 val1.m val2.m count
1:   a   x    1.5    6.5     2
2:   a   y    3.5    7.0     2
3:   b   x    2.0    8.0     2
4:   b   y    3.0    6.0     2

> DT[ , c(lapply(.SD, mean), count = .N), by = .(id1, id2)]   # mean over all columns
   id1 id2 val1 val2 count
1:   a   x  1.5  6.5     2
2:   a   y  3.5  7.0     2
3:   b   x  2.0  8.0     2
4:   b   y  3.0  6.0     2

For timings comparing aggregate (used in question and all 3 other answers) to data.table see this benchmark (the agg and agg.x cases).

Tags:

R

Aggregate

R Faq