Can bindings create memory leaks in WPF?

Not pretend to answer, just for reference. In a classic article on Finding Memory Leaks in WPF-based applications author Jossef Goldberg, described in detail cases, where there may be a memory leak in WPF application. Really, most relate to the .NET 3.5/4.0, but some cases may be relevant to this day. Also, have a small extension.

Quote about leak in Binding:

Cause:

This leak documented in this kb article. It is triggered because:

The TextBlock control has a binding to an object (myGrid) that has a reference back to the TextBlock (it is one of myGrid children’s).

Note: that this type of a DataBinding leak is unique to a specific scenario (and not to all DataBinding scenarios) as documented in the kb article. The property in the Path is a not a DependencyProperty and not on a class which implements INotifyPropertyChanged and in addition a chain of strong references must exist.

Code:

myDataBinding = new Binding("Children.Count");
myDataBinding.Source = myGrid; 
myDataBinding.Mode = BindingMode.OneWay;
MyTextBlock.SetBinding(TextBlock.TextProperty, myDataBinding);

Same leaky code can be also written in XAML:

<TextBlock Name="MyTextBlock" 
           Text="{Binding ElementName=myGrid, Path=Children.Count}" />

Fix/Workaround:

There are few of approaches, the easiest one is simply to clear the binding when the windows is about to close.

e.g.:

BindingOperations.ClearBinding(MyTextBlock, TextBlock.TextProperty);

Other approach is to set the mode of the data binding to OneTime. See the kb article for other ideas.

Useful link:

Avoiding a WPF memory leak with DataBinding

If you are not binding to a DependencyProperty or a object that implements INotifyPropertyChanged then the binding can leak memory, and you will have to unbind when you are done.

This is because if the object is not a DependencyProperty or does not implement INotifyPropertyChanged then it uses the ValueChanged event via the PropertyDescriptors AddValueChanged method. This causes the CLR to create a strong reference from the PropertyDescriptor to the object and in most cases the CLR will keep a reference to the PropertyDescriptor in a global table.

Because the binding must continue to listen for changes. This behavior keeps the reference alive between the PropertyDescriptor and the object as the target remains in use. This can cause a memory leak in the object and any object to which the object refers, This includes the data-binding target.

So in short if you are binding to a DependencyProperty or INotifyPropertyChanged object then you should be ok, otherwise like any subscribed event you should unsubscribe your bindings

---

Edit: There is a possibility this was fixed in .NET4.5 using Weak Events/References, But after a few quick tests it seemed the same to me, I will have to dive in more deeply to confirm, so I'll personally say in might be fixed in 4.5 :)