Computing $\int_0^\pi \sin(x) \; dx$ using the definition.

Below are some references I found in my "math library" at home this morning. Before posting just now, I quickly searched to see which were online and I've included links for those I found. The Boyer paper URL is a JSTOR item I don't have access to, but I've included the URL anyway because many here are probably at colleges/universities that have JSTOR access.

At the risk of pointing out the obvious, this method doesn't prove the Riemann integrability of ${\sin x},$ since equal length partitions are used along with endpoint evaluations. For instance, under this restriction the limit of the Riemann sums of the characteristic function of the rationals on a given compact interval exists. What this calculation does is give the value of the (Reimann) integral on a given compact interval under the assumption that the integral exists.

Direct quotes from original sources are indicated by italics. Within such a quote: (1) italics in the original is indicated by non-italics here; (2) brief additions and/or words of further explanation by me are indicated by non-italics between square braces "[stuff by me]"; (3) omissions in the original are indicated using "$[\dots]$".

[1] [Author not known], Sur la sinussoide [On the sinusoid], Question D'Examen, Nouvelles Annales de Mathématiques (1) 7 (1848), 436-437.

The (net) area above the $x$-axis and below the graph of $y = \sin{x},$ between $x = x_1$ and $x = x_2$ is found. The interval $[x_1, \, x_2]$ is divided into $n+1$ many abutting intervals each of length $h,$ so that $x_2 - x_1 = (n+1)h,$ and the identity $$h [\sin{x_1} + \sin{(x_1 + h)} + \sin{(x_2 + 2h)} + \cdots + \sin{(x_1 + nh)} \;\; = \;\; \frac{h \sin \left(x_1 + \frac{nh}{2}\right) \sin \frac{h}{2}(n+1)}{\sin{\frac{h}{2}}}$$ along with $\frac{nh}{2} = \frac{x_2 - x_1 - h}{2}$ is used to obtain the value $2\sin{\left(\frac{x_2 + x_1}{2}\right)} \sin{\left(\frac{x_2 - x_1}{2}\right)},$ which equals $\cos{x_1} - \cos{x_2}.$ Note: There is a typo at one point in the original, in which $\sin{(x_2 + h)}$ appears instead of $\sin{(x_2 + 2h)}.$ Also, the text only observes that the area's expression in terms of the sine function reduces to $1 - \cos{x_2}$ when $x_1 = 0.$

[2] William Elwood Byerly, Elements of the Integral Calculus, 2nd edition, Ginn and Company, 1892, xvi + 339 + 11 + 32 pages.

See Chapter VIII, Article 81, p. 76, Examples (2): By the aid of the trigonometrical formulas $$\cos{\theta} + \cos{2\theta} + \cos{3\theta} + \cdots + \cos{(n-1)\theta} = \frac{1}{2}\left[\sin{n\theta} \cot{\frac{\theta}{2}} - 1 - \cos{n\theta}\right],$$ [and] $$\sin{\theta} + \sin{2\theta} + \sin{3\theta} + \cdots + \sin{(n-1)\theta} = \frac{1}{2}\left[(1 - \cos{n\theta}) \cot{\frac{\theta}{2}} - \sin{n\theta}\right],$$ prove that $\;\;\int_{a}^{b}\cos{x}.dx = \sin{b} - \sin{a},\;$ and $\;\int_{a}^{b}\sin{x}.dx = \cos{a} - \cos{b}.$

[3] Carl Benjamin Boyer, History of the derivative and integral of the sine, Mathematics Teacher 40 #6 (October 1947), 267-275.

[4] Mark Bridger, A note on areas under a sine curve, The Pentagon 18 #1 (Fall 1958), 24-26.

At the time Mark Bridger was a student at the Bronx High School of Science (New York).

[5] Richard Courant and Fritz John, Introduction to Calculus and Analysis, Volume I, John Wiley and Sons (Interscience Publishers), 1965, xxiv + 661 pages.

See Chapter 2.2.e (Integration of $\sin x$ and $\cos x$), p. 135.

[6] Godfrey Harold Hardy, A Course of Pure Mathematics, 10th edition, Cambridge University Press, 1952, xii + 509 pages.

See Chapter VII, Article 164, p. 320, item 3. Calculate $\int_{a}^{b}x^2 \, dx,$ $\int_{a}^{b} \cos{mx} \, dx$ and $\int_{a}^{b} \sin{mx} \, dx$ by the method of Ex. 1. Note: Hardy's reference to "the method of Ex. 1" is simply the method of partitioning the interval $[a,b]$ into finitely many equal length subintervals, forming the relevant Riemann sum, and taking a limit. The needed trigonometric identities are not given as a hint, but I do notice that a closely related identity appears in Exercise 4 at the top of p. 323 for another purpose.

[7] Kenneth Sielke Miller and John Breffni Walsh, Elementary and Advanced Trigonometry, Harper and Brothers, 1962, xii + 350 pages.

See Chapter 10.3 (Solution of the Area Problem), pp. 215-217: (begins) We now turn to the second problem mentioned at the beginning of the chapter, namely, that of finding the area under one arch of a sine curve.

[8] Isidor Pavlovich Natanson, Summation of Infinitely Small Quantities, Topics in Mathematics, D. C. Heath and Company, 1963, viii + 59 pages.

See Chapter 6 (The Sinusoid), Articles 26-35, pp. 46-57. Specifically, see Article 29 (A trigonometric sum), Article 30 (A subsidiary inequality), Article 31 (The sine of an infinitely small angle), and Article 32 (The quadrature of the sinusoid) on pp. 46-51. The remaining articles in this chapter involve applications, mainly in calculating the volume of a rotating sinusoid and calculating effective (electrical) current.

[9] John Meigs Hubbell Olmsted, Intermediate Analysis. An Introduction to the Theory of Functions of One Real Variable, The Appleton-Century Mathematics Series, Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1956, xiv + 306 pages.

See Chapter 5, Article 503, p. 145, Exercise #19 & 20. The reader is asked to show that $\int_{a}^{b}\sin x \, dx = \cos{a} - \cos{b}$ and $\int_{a}^{b}\cos x \, dx = \sin{b} - \sin{a}$ by using equal length partitions of $[a,b].$ The relevant trig. identities are indirectly provided (by means of a hint, the reader is led to obtain these identities).

[10] Michael David Spivak, Calculus, 3rd edition, Publish or Perish, 1994, xiv + 670 pages.

See Chapter 15, p. 320, Problem 33.

[11] Isaac Todhunter, A Treatise on the Integral Calculus, 6th edition, MacMillan and Company, 1880, viii + 408 pages.

See Chapter IV, Article 38, pp. 52-53: (begins) Suppose we wish to find the integral of $\sin x$ between limits $a$ and $b$ immediately from the definition. By Art. 4 we have to find the limit $[\ldots]$ Note: The copy I found online is dated 1863, but what I've quoted seems to be the same calculation and it's in the same location in the book.

[12] Edwin Bidwell Wilson, Advanced Calculus, Ginn and Company, 1911, x + 566 pages.

See Chapter I, p. 30, Exercise 9. With the aid of the trigonometric formulas $[\ldots]$ show $(\alpha) \; \int_{a}^{b} \cos{x}\,dx = \sin{b} - \sin{a},\;\;$ [and] $\;\;(\beta) \; \int_{a}^{b} \sin{x}\,dx = \cos{a} - \cos{b}.$

(ADDED 3 DAYS LATER) I thought it would be useful to archive in my answer some references for evaluating definite integrals of other functions by Reimann sums. However, because I want to get this finished during my lunch hour and I don't want to substantially increase the length of this already long answer, I will use briefer citations.

Harding/Barnett, Solution to Calculus Problem #369, Amer. Math. Monthly 22 #6 (June 1915), 208-210.

Two solutions for the evaluation of $\int_{a}^{b} \ln{x}\,dx$. The second solution makes use of Fermat's method of geometric subdivision of the interval $[a,b].$

Barnett, Solution to Calculus Problem #366, Amer. Math. Monthly 22 #5 (May 1915), 168-169.

One solution for the evaluation of $\int_{a}^{b}{\sin}^{-1}x\,dx.$

Eli Maor, On the direct integration $\int_{a}^{b}x^{n}\,dx,$ Int. J. Math. Educ. Sci. Technol. 5 (1974), 199-200.

The method involves working with the sum of the left endpoint sums and the right endpoint sums. The method might be similar to what Otto Dunkel does in Note on the quadrature of the parabola, Amer. Math. Monthly 27 #3 (March 1920), 116-117.

Finally, the following are similar to the kind of things found in Natanson's Summation of Infinitely Small Quantities:

W. R. Longley, Some limit proofs in solid geometry, Amer. Math. Monthly 31 #4 (April 1924), 196-202.

Joseph B. Reynolds, Some applications of algebra to theorems in solid geometry, Mathematics Teacher 18 #1 (January 1925), 1-9.

Jos. B. Reynolds, Finding plane areas by algebra, Mathematics Teacher 21 #4 (April 1928), 197-203.

I suspect Tom Apostol's calculus textbook has this (i.e., finds $\int_0^\pi\sin x\,dx$ by using limits of Riemann sums without the fundamental theorem).

I question the place of Riemann sums in the curriculum. Rigorous definitions are unsuitable for a calculus-for-liberal-education course unless the students are unusual. Such a course should acquaint students with the reason why calculus is important in the course of human events over recent and coming centuries, and with the fact that it overcame difficulties like how to define $\text{rate} = \dfrac{\text{distance}}{\text{time}}$ when the distance and the time are both $0$, and how to to find $$\sum\text{force}\times\text{distance}$$ when there are infinitely many infinitely small distances, each with its own value of "force". The conventional calculus course is a watered-down version of a course for students who come in with a prior desire or a pre-identified need to understand calculus, rather than for students who are there in order to pay a price in homework for a grade to impress employers, and whom one should be trying to seduce into another course of action.

If you expect students to marvel at the fact that it's possible to find this integral by using limits of Riemann sums, I expect the way they will think of it and remember it is "We did some technical stuff and turned it in and got graded", and if you have them plod through finding the integral by antidifferentiating and substituting endpoint values, then the way they will think of it and remember it is "We did some technical stuff and turned it in and got graded", and they won't know the difference. (I'm hoping for a malpractice suit against every university that knowingly encourages unqualified students to take calculus, to the point where those are 99.9% of the ones who show up. They bring in tuition money.)

Another occasion for Riemann sums is numerical integration, but that doesn't seem to be your purpose.