Difference between [ngClass] vs [class] binding
This is special Angular binding syntax
<div [class.extra-sparkle]="isDelightful">
This is part of the Angular compiler and you can't build a custom binding variant following this binding style. The only supported are [class.xxx]="..."
, [style.xxx]="..."
, and [attr.xxx]="..."
ngClass
is a normal Angular directive like you can build it yourself
<div [ngClass]="{'extra-sparkle': isDelightful}">
ngClass
is more powerful. It allows you to bind a string of classes, an array of strings, or an object like in your example.
Using [ngClass]
you're able to apply multiple classes in a really convenient way. You can even apply a function that will return an object of classes. [class.
makes you able to apply only one class (of course you can use class. a few times but it looks really bad).
The above two lines of code is with respect to CSS
class
binding in Angular. There are basically 2-3 ways you can bind css class to angular components.
You provide a class name with class.className
between brackets in your templates and then an expression on the right that should evaluate to true or false to determine if the class should be applied. That is the below one where extra-sparkle(key) is the css class and isDelightful(value)
.
<div [class.extra-sparkle]="isDelightful">
When multiple classes should potentially be added, the NgClass directive comes in really handy. NgClass
should receive an object with class names as keys and expressions that evaluate to true or false. extra-sparkle is the key and isDelightful
is the value (boolean
).
<div [ngClass]="{'extra-sparkle': isDelightful}">
Now along with extra sparkle, you can glitter your div
also.
<div [ngClass]="{'extra-sparkle': isDelightful,'extra-glitter':isGlitter}">
or
export class AppComponent {
isDelightful: boolean = true;
isGlitter: boolean = true;
get sparkleGlitter()
{
let classes = {
extra-sparkle: this.isDelightful,
extra-glitter: this.isGlitter
};
return classes;
}
}
<div [ngClass]='sparkleGlitter'>
For ngClass
, you can have conditional ternary operators too.