Linq: adding conditions to the where clause conditionally

one option.

bool? age = null

(from u in DataContext.Users
           where u.Division == strUserDiv 
           && (age == null || (age != null && u.Age > age.Value))
           && u.Height > strHeightinFeet  
           select new DTO_UserMaster
           {
             Prop1 = u.Name,
           }).ToList();

or you could switch to the method syntax for linq and use if conditions to attach expressions to the where clause.

Simply I am using it in my where clause as

    public IList<ent_para> getList(ent_para para){
     db.table1.Where(w=>(para.abc!=""?w.para==para.abc:true==true) && (para.xyz!=""?w.xyz==para.xyz:true==true)).ToList();
}

I usually use method chaining but have the same problem. And here is extension I use

public static IQueryable<T> ConditionalWhere<T>(
        this IQueryable<T> source, 
        Func<bool> condition,
        Expression<Func<T, bool>> predicate)
    {
        if (condition())
        {
            return source.Where(predicate);
        }

        return source;
    }

It helps to avoid chain breaks. Also the same ConditionalOrderBy and ConditionalOrderByDescending are helpful.

If you do not call ToList() and your final mapping to the DTO type, you can add Where clauses as you go, and build the results at the end:

var query = from u in DataContext.Users
   where u.Division == strUserDiv 
   && u.Age > 18
   && u.Height > strHeightinFeet
   select u;

if (useAge)
   query = query.Where(u => u.Age > age);

if (useHeight)
   query = query.Where(u => u.Height > strHeightinFeet);

// Build the results at the end
var results = query.Select(u => new DTO_UserMaster
   {
     Prop1 = u.Name,
   }).ToList();

This will still only result in a single call to the database, which will be effectively just as efficient as writing the query in one pass.