Passing slice of a static/dynamic array by reference with start and length specifier

Updated See a bit down for a generics solution.

Here is an alternative that encapsulates the type cast needed for the offset inside a function, which resides in an advanced record declared as a class function. Besides hiding the type cast, the offset is range checked against the high index of the array.

More types can be added if needed.

Type
  SubRange = record
    Type
      TIntLongArray = array[0..MaxInt div SizeOf(Integer) - 1] of integer;
      PIntLongArray = ^TIntLongArray;
      TByteLongArray = array[0..MaxInt div SizeOf(Byte) - 1] of Byte;
      PByteLongArray = ^TByteLongArray;

    class function Offset( const anArray : array of Integer; 
                                 offset  : Integer) : PIntLongArray; overload; static;
    class function Offset( const anArray : array of Byte; 
                                 offset  : Integer) : PByteLongArray; overload; static;
    // ToDo: Add more types ...
  end;

class function SubRange.Offset(const anArray : array of Integer; 
                                     offset  : Integer): PIntLongArray;
begin
  Assert(offset <= High(anArray));
  Result := PIntLongArray(@anArray[offset]);
end;

class function SubRange.Offset(const anArray : array of Byte; 
                                     offset  : Integer): PByteLongArray;
begin
  Assert(offset <= High(anArray));
  Result := PByteLongArray(@anArray[offset]);
end;

Note : the sum of the offset and the slice must not exceed the element count of the array.

Example calls:

WorkWithArray( Slice(SubRange.Offset(staticArray,1)^,2));
WorkWithArray( Slice(SubRange.Offset(dynArray,1)^,2));
WorkWithArray( Slice(SubRange.Offset(dynArrayG,1)^,2));

While this looks better, I'm still not convinced this is the optimal solution.


Update

When writing the above solution, I had a generics solution as the ultimate goal.

Here is an answer that utilizes anonymous methods and generics to implement a Slice(anArray,startIndex,Count) method that can be used with both static and dynamic arrays.

A straight generics solution would rely on range checking be turned off at every placed where it was used, and that would not be a pretty solution. The reason is that SizeOf(T) could not be used to declare a static array type of maximum size:

TGenericArray = array[0..MaxInt div SizeOf(T) - 1] of T; // SizeOf(T) not resolved

So we would have to use:

TGenericArray = array[0..0] of T;

instead. And this triggers the range check when it is on, for index > 0.

Solution

But the problem could be solved by another strategy, callbacks or a more modern terminology would be Inversion of Control (IoC) or Dependeny Injection (DI). The concept is best explained with, "Don't call me, we call you".

Instead of using a direct function, we pass the operational code as an anonymous method together with all parameters. Now the range check problem is contained within the Slice<T> frame.

Slice<Integer>.Execute(
  procedure(const arr: array of Integer)
  begin
    WriteLn(Math.SumInt(arr));
  end, dArr, 2, 7);

unit uGenericSlice;

interface

type
  Slice<T> = record
  private
    type
      PGenericArr = ^TGenericArr;
      TGenericArr = array [0..0] of T;
  public
    type
      TConstArrProc = reference to procedure(const anArr: array of T);
    class procedure Execute(       aProc: TConstArrProc;
                             const anArray: array of T;
                                   startIndex,Count: Integer); static;
  end;

implementation

class procedure Slice<T>.Execute(aProc: TConstArrProc;
  const anArray: array of T; startIndex, Count: Integer);
begin
  if (startIndex <= 0) then
    aProc(Slice(anArray, Count))
  else
  begin
    // The expression PGenericArr(@anArray[startIndex]) can trigger range check error
    {$IFOPT R+}
      {$DEFINE RestoreRangeCheck}
      {$R-}
    {$ENDIF}
    Assert((startIndex <= High(anArray)) and (Count <= High(anArray)-startIndex+1),
      'Range check error');
    aProc(Slice(PGenericArr(@anArray[startIndex])^, Count));
    {$IFDEF RestoreRangeCheck}
      {$UNDEF RestoreRangeCheck}
      {$R+}
    {$ENDIF}
  end;
end;

end.

Here are some example use cases:

program ProjectGenericSlice;

{$APPTYPE CONSOLE}

uses
  Math,
  uGenericSlice in 'uGenericSlice.pas';

function Sum(const anArr: array of Integer): Integer;
var
  i: Integer;
begin
  Result := 0;
  for i in anArr do
    Result := Result + i;
end;

procedure SumTest(const arr: array of integer);
begin
  WriteLn(Sum(arr));
end;

procedure TestAll;
var
  aProc: Slice<Integer>.TConstArrProc;
  dArr: TArray<Integer>;
  mySum: Integer;
const
  sArr: array [1 .. 10] of Integer = (
    1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10);

begin
  dArr := TArray<Integer>.Create(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10);

  aProc :=
    procedure(const arr: array of Integer)
    begin
      WriteLn(Sum(arr));
    end;

  // Test predefined anonymous method
  Slice<Integer>.Execute( aProc, dArr, 2, 7);

  // Test inlined anonymous method
  Slice<Integer>.Execute(
    procedure(const arr: array of Integer)
    begin
      WriteLn(Sum(arr));
    end, dArr, 2, 7);

  // Test call to Math.SumInt
  Slice<Integer>.Execute(
    procedure(const arr: array of Integer)
    begin
      WriteLn(Math.SumInt(arr));
    end, dArr, 2, 7);

  // Test static array with Low(sArr) > 0
  Slice<Integer>.Execute(
    procedure(const arr: array of Integer)
    begin
      WriteLn(Sum(arr));
    end, sArr, 3 - Low(sArr), 7);

  // Using a real procedure
  Slice<Integer>.Execute(
    SumTest, // Cannot be nested inside TestAll
    dArr, 2, 7);

  // Test call where result is passed to local var
  Slice<Integer>.Execute(
    procedure(const arr: array of Integer)
    begin
      mySum := Math.SumInt(arr);
    end, dArr, 2, 7);
  WriteLn(mySum);

end;

begin
  TestAll;
  ReadLn;
end.