Performance and Memory allocation comparison between List and Set
If you don't care about the ordering, and don't delete elements, then it really boils down to whether you need to find elements in this data structure, and how fast you need those lookups to be.
Finding an element by value in a HashSet
is O(1)
. In an ArrayList
, it's O(n)
.
If you are only using the container to store a bunch of unique objects, and iterate over them at the end (in any order), then arguably ArrayList
is a better choice since it's simpler and more economical.
If you will compare, searching between List and Set, Set will be better because of the underline Hashing algorithm.
In the case of a list, in worst case scenario, contains will search till the end. In case of Set, because of hashing and bucket, it will search only subset.
Sample use case: Add 1 to 100_000 integer to ArrayList and HashSet. Search each integer in ArrayList and HashSet.
Set will take 9 milliseconds where as List will take 16232 seconds.
private static void compareSetvsList(){
List<Integer> list = new ArrayList<>() ;
Set<Integer> set = new HashSet<>() ;
System.out.println("Setting values in list and set .... ");
int counter = 100_000 ;
for(int i =0 ; i< counter ; i++){
list.add(i);
set.add(i);
}
System.out.println("Checking time .... ");
long l1 = System.currentTimeMillis();
for(int i =0 ; i< counter ; i++) list.contains(i);
long l2 = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println(" time taken for list : "+ (l2-l1));
for(int i =0 ; i< counter ; i++)set.contains(i);
long l3 = System.currentTimeMillis();
System.out.println(" time taken for set : "+ (l3-l2));
// for 10000 time taken for list : 123 time taken for set : 4
// for 100000 time taken for list : 16232 time taken for set : 9
// for 1000000 time taken for list : hung time taken for set : 26
}
If you plan only to add elements and later iterate over them, your best bet is ArrayList
as it's closest to the arrays you are replacing. It's more memory efficient than LinkedList
or any Set
implementation, has fast insertion, iteration, and random access.
HashSet
consumes about 5.5 times more memory than ArrayList
for the same number of elements (although they're both still linear), and has significantly slower iteration (albeit with the same asymptotics); a quick Google search suggests a 2-3x slowdown for HashSet
iteration versus ArrayList
.
If you don't care about uniqueness or the performance of contains
, then use ArrayList
.