Sort an array of objects based on another array of ids

You can provide a custom comparison function to JavaScript's Array#sort method.

Use the custom comparison function to ensure the sort order:

var sortOrder = [2,3,1,4],
    items     = [{id: 1}, {id: 2}, {id: 3}, {id: 4}];

items.sort(function (a, b) {
  return sortOrder.indexOf(a.id) - sortOrder.indexOf(b.id);
});

MDN:

• If compareFunction(a, b) returns less than 0, sort a to an index lower than b (i.e. a comes first).
• If compareFunction(a, b) returns 0, leave a and b unchanged with respect to each other, but sorted with respect to all different elements. Note: the ECMAscript standard does not guarantee this behavior, thus, not all browsers (e.g. Mozilla versions dating back to at least 2003) respect this.
• If compareFunction(a, b) returns greater than 0, sort b to an index lower than a (i.e. b comes first).

---

Hitmands made a very fair comment on the above solution:

This approach is O(n2), and would cause performance issues in big sized lists. Better to build the dictionary first, so that it stays O(n)

The above solution might be slow for large inputs because it uses indexOf for every single comparison, and indexOf is already itself slow (O(n)) compared to dictionary lookups (O(1)).

To implement Hitmands' suggestion:

let sortOrder = [2,3,1,4],
    items     = [{id: 1}, {id: 2}, {id: 3}, {id: 4}];

const itemPositions = {};
for (const [index, id] of sortOrder.entries()) {
  itemPositions[id] = index;
}

items.sort((a, b) => itemPositions[a.id] - itemPositions[b.id]);

Using ES6 map and find

const a = [2,3,1,4];
const b = [{id: 1}, {id: 2}, {id: 3}, {id: 4}];

// map over a, find it in b and return    
const c = a.map((i) => b.find((j) => j.id === i));

Ramda really shines for these types of problems.

Where the size of the data is small, we can use a simple reduce function, and indexOf helper.

// match id of object to required index and insert
var sortInsert = function (acc, cur) {
  var toIdx = R.indexOf(cur.id, a);
  acc[toIdx] = cur;
  return acc;
};

// point-free sort function created
var sort = R.reduce(sortInsert, []);

// execute it now, or later as required
sort(b);
// [ { id: 2 }, { id: 3 }, { id: 1 }, { id: 4 } ]

This works well for small(ish) data sets but the indexOf operation on every iteration through the reduction is inefficient for large data sets.

We can remedy this by tackling the problem from the other side, lets use groupBy to group our objects by their id, thus creating a dictionary lookup (much better!). We can then simply map over the required indexes and transform them to their corresponding object at that position.

And here is the solution using this approach:

var groupById = R.groupBy(R.prop('id'), b);

var sort = R.map(function (id) {
    return groupById[id][0];
});

sort(a);
// [ { id: 2 }, { id: 3 }, { id: 1 }, { id: 4 } ]

Finally, this is yet another solution, which is very succinct:

R.sortBy(R.pipe(R.prop('id'), R.indexOf(R.__, a)))(b);
// [ { id: 2 }, { id: 3 }, { id: 1 }, { id: 4 } ]

I love the way you can compose functions with behaviour and separate the algorithm from the data upon which it acts using Ramda. You end up with very readable, and easy to maintain code.