Uneven height when using superscript in frac

The problem is in the “i”, where the ascender is setting the overall height of the nucleus in \sin^2.

You can fix this by smashing the “i”; however, this would create problems if you do \overline{\sin x}; a solution is to add another phantom before the real operator. I add a \mathop atom containing the phantom for the real name, followed by \! so the thin space that TeX inserts between two consecutive \mathop atoms is removed.

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}

\makeatletter
\newcommand{\sinname}{sin}% change here

\newcommand{\sin@name}{%
  \smash{\operator@font\sinname}\vphantom{s}%
}
\DeclareRobustCommand{\sin}{%
  \mathop{\vphantom{\operator@font\sinname}}\!%
  \qopname\relax o{\sin@name}%
}
\makeatother

\begin{document}
\begin{gather*}
\frac{1}{\sin\theta}+\frac{1}{\sin\alpha}\ne
  \frac{1}{\sin^2\theta}+\frac{1}{\sin^2\alpha}
\\
\frac{1}{\sin\theta}\frac{\partial}{\partial\theta}\ne
\frac{1}{\sin^2\theta}\frac{\partial^2}{\partial\theta^2}
\\
\sqrt{\sin\alpha}+\sqrt{\cos\alpha}
\\
\frac{1}{\sqrt{\sin\alpha}}+\frac{1}{\sqrt{\cos\alpha}}
\\
\overline{\sin\alpha}
\end{gather*}
\end{document}

enter image description here

Nothing's perfect in this world! You can see the third line has the square root sign at different heights. A possible solution for this would be redefining \cos to have the same height as \sin:

\DeclareRobustCommand{\cos}{%
  \mathop{\vphantom{\operator@font\sinname}}\!%
  \qopname\relax o{cos}%
}

Since some typographic traditions use a different tag for \sin (it might be “sen”), I only provide \sinname as it shouldn't be necessary for \cos to have a changing name.

With this definition, the overline would be at the same level for \sin and \cos, which might or not be desired.


Obviously (;-) @egreg’s answer is great and goes right to the point, but it does have an infinitesimal drawback: a pervert who tried $\overline{\sin x}$ would get a surprise. Moreover, one could argue that the placement of the radical sign in $\sqrt{\sin x}$ is suboptimal.

The positioning of superscripts in math formulas is a very low-level feature of TeX, which is described, along with many other “intimate” details of math typesetting, in Appendix G of The TeXbook, to which you are referred for an explanation of the following solution.

\documentclass[a4paper]{article}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{amsmath}

% egreg's recipe:
\makeatletter
\DeclareRobustCommand{\sinname}{%
  \smash{\operator@font sin}\vphantom{s}%
}
% ... but let us use a different name for the operator:
\newcommand{\ssin}{\qopname\relax o{\sinname}}
\makeatother

% Our recipe:
\setbox0 = \hbox{$$} % load math fonts
\fontdimen18\scriptfont2 = 3.78970pt % turns out to be just enough

\begin{document}

The downside in egreg's answer:
\[\sqrt{\sin x}+\sqrt{\ssin x} + \overline{\sin x}+\overline{\ssin x}\]
That's not fine.

But, with our correction, the exponent of the ``usual'' \verb|\sin| will not be 
rised that much:
\[ \frac{1}{\cos^{2}x} + \frac{1}{\sin^{2}x} + \frac{1}{x^{2}} \]
For an explanation, see \textsl{The \TeX book}, Appendix~G, Rule~18a; the
relevant passage is ``set \( u\gets h-q \)\,\ldots\ where $q$\,\ldots\ [is] the
[value] of~$\sigma_{18}$\,\ldots\ in the font corresponding to
[style]~$C{\uparrow}$''.  What we are doing is to increase~$q$.  The amended
value of~$u$ will be subsequently used in Rule~18c to position the superscript.

\end{document}

Here’s the output:

Output of the code

Let us also magnify the crucial portion:

Detail of the above

Of course, this solution could have drawbacks too: changing in this way a parameter that operate at so low a level of TeX might cause side-effects which are not evident at first sight.


You can adjust the amount of space left for denominators using font dimen 11,

enter image description here

\documentclass{article}
\sbox0{$1$}


\fontdimen11\textfont2=8pt

\begin{document}

\[
\frac{1}{\sin\vartheta}
\frac{1}{\sin^{2}\vartheta}
\]

\end{document}