Why doesn't an if constexpr make this core constant expression error disappear?
The standard doesn't say much about the discarded statement of an if constexpr
. There are essentially two statements in [stmt.if] about these:
- In an enclosing template discarded statements are not instantiated.
- Names referenced from a discarded statement are not required ODR to be defined.
Neither of these applies to your use: the compilers are correct to complain about the constexpr
if initialisation. Note that you'll need to make the condition dependent on a template parameter when you want to take advantage of the instantiation to fail: if the value isn't dependent on a template parameter the failure happens when the template is defined. For example, this code still fails:
template <typename T>
void f() {
constexpr int x = -1;
if constexpr (x >= 0){
constexpr int y = 1<<x;
}
}
However, if you make x
dependent on the type T
it is OK, even when f
is instantiated with int
:
template <typename T>
void f() {
constexpr T x = -1;
if constexpr (x >= 0){
constexpr int y = 1<<x;
}
}
int main() {
f<int>();
}
Note that for the statement discarded by Constexpr If:
the discarded statement can't be ill-formed for every possible specialization:
To fix the issue you can make the statement depending on the template parameter, e.g.
template<typename T, int X> struct dependent_value { constexpr static int V = X; };
template <typename T>
void foo() {
constexpr int x = -1;
if constexpr (x >= 0){
constexpr int y = 1 << dependent_value<T, x>::V;
}
}
LIVE
I'm not sure why you expect the branch to not be checked. The only time an if branch is "not checked" is when it is part of a template and not instantiated, as per [stmt.if]p2:
During the instantiation of an enclosing templated entity (Clause 17), if the condition is not value-dependent after its instantiation, the discarded substatement (if any) is not instantiated.
Your code doesn't seem to be in a situation where this applies.