Is open-plan office for academia at all?
There is plenty of research showing that open-plan offices are a very bad idea, not just in academia but everywhere (see below for some examples).
Unfortunately, they are also much cheaper than proper offices (mainly because you can pack people much more densely).
Danielsson et al. (2014): "Office design's impact on sick leave rates", Ergonomics 57(2), doi:10.1080/00140139.2013.871064:
The cumulative evidence thus indicates that traditional open-plan offices are less good for employee health.
Oommen et al. (2008): "Should Health Service Managers Embrace Open Plan Work Environments?: A Review" Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management 3(2), 37-43:
Research evidence shows that employees face a multitude of problems such as the loss of privacy, loss of identity, low work productivity, various health issues, overstimulation and low job satisfaction when working in an open plan work environment.
Although a 50 person office is larger than I have seen, open plan and shared offices are not uncommon in academia especially for graduate students and post docs. For individuals with teaching and supervisory responsibilities, open plan offices become less practical due to the need for privacy. The advantage of shared offices is that they help to foster interactions. Of course you can just leave your office door open, but many departments you can walk down the hall and all the doors are shut and you rarely get to interact with colleagues.
As for asking for a different office, it cannot hurt to ask. In one group I used to work in there was a 15+ person office with two small 1 person offices for hot desking at. It might be possible to wall off an area for hot desking. The idea behind hot desking is that multiple people can share a one person office since you will not need a quite office all the time. With networked computers or laptops it doesn't really matter what desk you are sitting at. This way you can setup small offices for dedicated tasks (e.g., reading, writing, and programming). Groups that spend a lot of time in a wet lab or a clinic often benefit from hot desking.
If you don't ask, then people will not know how to make the work environment better.
Is open-plan office for academia at all?
There is a pretty clear scientific consensus that open spaces has an overall negative impact on employees.
Some quotes from scientific studies on open space:
- {2}: "Despite perceived privacy, irrelevant speech contributes to mental workload, poor performance, stress, and fatigue"
- {4}: "Fewer words were remembered with working high noise compared to low noise. The participants were more tired after work in high noise compared to low noise."
- {5}: "Noise has repeatedly been shown to be one of the most recurrent reasons for complaints in open-plan office environments"
- {6} gives a nice overview of several scientific studies:
- "In 2011, the organizational psychologist Matthew Davis reviewed more than a hundred studies about office environments. He found that, though open offices often fostered a symbolic sense of organizational mission, making employees feel like part of a more laid-back, innovative enterprise, they were damaging to the workers’ attention spans, productivity, creative thinking, and satisfaction. Compared with standard offices, employees experienced more uncontrolled interactions, higher levels of stress, and lower levels of concentration and motivation."
- "When David Craig surveyed some thirty-eight thousand workers, he found that interruptions by colleagues were detrimental to productivity, and that the more senior the employee, the worse she fared."
- "Psychologically, the repercussions of open offices are relatively straightforward. Physical barriers have been closely linked to psychological privacy, and a sense of privacy boosts job performance."
- "Open offices also remove an element of control, which can lead to feelings of helplessness. In a 2005 study that looked at organizations ranging from a Midwest auto supplier to a Southwest telecom firm, researchers found that the ability to control the environment had a significant effect on team cohesion and satisfaction. When workers couldn’t change the way that things looked, adjust the lighting and temperature, or choose how to conduct meetings, spirits plummeted."
- "An open environment may even have a negative impact on our health. In a recent study of more than twenty-four hundred employees in Denmark, Jan Pejtersen and his colleagues found that as the number of people working in a single room went up, the number of employees who took sick leave increased apace. Workers in two-person offices took an average of fifty per cent more sick leave than those in single offices, while those who worked in fully open offices were out an average of sixty-two per cent more."
- "But the most problematic aspect of the open office may be physical rather than psychological: simple noise. In laboratory settings, noise has been repeatedly tied to reduced cognitive performance. The psychologist Nick Perham, who studies the effect of sound on how we think, has found that office commotion impairs workers’ ability to recall information, and even to do basic arithmetic. Listening to music to block out the office intrusion doesn’t help: even that, Perham found, impairs our mental acuity. Exposure to noise in an office may also take a toll on the health of employees. In a study by the Cornell University psychologists Gary Evans and Dana Johnson, clerical workers who were exposed to open-office noise for three hours had increased levels of epinephrine—a hormone that we often call adrenaline, associated with the so-called fight-or-flight response. What’s more, Evans and Johnson discovered that people in noisy environments made fewer ergonomic adjustments than they would in private, causing increased physical strain. The subjects subsequently attempted to solve fewer puzzles than they had after working in a quiet environment; in other words, they became less motivated and less creative."
The list of scientific studies showing the negative impacts of open spaces is endless. I would argue that the nature of the job of a researcher makes open space even more harmful to their productivity.
References:
- {2} Smith-Jackson, Tonya L., and Katherine W. Klein. "Open-plan offices: Task performance and mental workload." Journal of Environmental Psychology 29, no. 2 (2009): 279-289. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=1320841413872385547&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5 ; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.09.002
- {4} Jahncke, Helena, Staffan Hygge, Niklas Halin, Anne Marie Green, and Kenth Dimberg. "Open-plan office noise: Cognitive performance and restoration." Journal of Environmental Psychology 31, no. 4 (2011): 373-382. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=2806953389437638934&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5
- {5} Seddigh, Aram, Erik Berntson, Fredrik Jönsson, Christina Bodin Danielson, and Hugo Westerlund. "The effect of noise absorption variation in open-plan offices: A field study with a cross-over design." Journal of environmental psychology 44 (2015): 34-44. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=12448706430490137819&hl=en&as_sdt=0,5
- {6} https://web.archive.org/web/20171109203333/https://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/the-open-office-trap