Javascript getCookie functions
Yes, the W3Schools solution is incorrect.
For those that would like it, here is a simpler solution that works. It just prepends a space so the single call to indexOf() only returns the correct cookie.
function getCookie(c_name) {
var c_value = " " + document.cookie;
var c_start = c_value.indexOf(" " + c_name + "=");
if (c_start == -1) {
c_value = null;
}
else {
c_start = c_value.indexOf("=", c_start) + 1;
var c_end = c_value.indexOf(";", c_start);
if (c_end == -1) {
c_end = c_value.length;
}
c_value = unescape(c_value.substring(c_start,c_end));
}
return c_value;
}
The function from W3CSchool is wrong. It fails if there are multiple cookies that have the same suffix like:
ffoo=bar; foo=baz
When you search for foo
it will return the value of ffoo instead of foo.
Now here is what I would do: First of all, you need get to know the syntax of how cookies are transported. Netscape’s original specification (there are only copies available like this one at haxx.se) uses semicolons to separate multiple cookies while each name/value pair has the following syntax:
NAME
=
VALUE
This string is a sequence of characters excluding semi-colon, comma and white space. If there is a need to place such data in the name or value, some encoding method such as URL style%XX
encoding is recommended, though no encoding is defined or required.
So splitting document.cookie
string at semi-colons or commas is a viable option.
Besides that, RFC 2109 does also specify that cookies are separated by either semi-colons or commas:
cookie = "Cookie:" cookie-version 1*((";" | ",") cookie-value) cookie-value = NAME "=" VALUE [";" path] [";" domain] cookie-version = "$Version" "=" value NAME = attr VALUE = value path = "$Path" "=" value domain = "$Domain" "=" value
Although both are allowed, commas are preferred as they are the default separator of list items in HTTP.
Note: For backward compatibility, the separator in the Cookie header is semi-colon (
;
) everywhere. A server should also accept comma (,
) as the separator between cookie-values for future compatibility.
Furthermore, the name/value pair has some further restrictions as the VALUE can also be a quoted string as specified in RFC 2616:
attr = token value = token | quoted-string
So these two cookie versions need to be treated separately:
if (typeof String.prototype.trimLeft !== "function") {
String.prototype.trimLeft = function() {
return this.replace(/^\s+/, "");
};
}
if (typeof String.prototype.trimRight !== "function") {
String.prototype.trimRight = function() {
return this.replace(/\s+$/, "");
};
}
if (typeof Array.prototype.map !== "function") {
Array.prototype.map = function(callback, thisArg) {
for (var i=0, n=this.length, a=[]; i<n; i++) {
if (i in this) a[i] = callback.call(thisArg, this[i]);
}
return a;
};
}
function getCookies() {
var c = document.cookie, v = 0, cookies = {};
if (document.cookie.match(/^\s*\$Version=(?:"1"|1);\s*(.*)/)) {
c = RegExp.$1;
v = 1;
}
if (v === 0) {
c.split(/[,;]/).map(function(cookie) {
var parts = cookie.split(/=/, 2),
name = decodeURIComponent(parts[0].trimLeft()),
value = parts.length > 1 ? decodeURIComponent(parts[1].trimRight()) : null;
cookies[name] = value;
});
} else {
c.match(/(?:^|\s+)([!#$%&'*+\-.0-9A-Z^`a-z|~]+)=([!#$%&'*+\-.0-9A-Z^`a-z|~]*|"(?:[\x20-\x7E\x80\xFF]|\\[\x00-\x7F])*")(?=\s*[,;]|$)/g).map(function($0, $1) {
var name = $0,
value = $1.charAt(0) === '"'
? $1.substr(1, -1).replace(/\\(.)/g, "$1")
: $1;
cookies[name] = value;
});
}
return cookies;
}
function getCookie(name) {
return getCookies()[name];
}
This, from w3schools, is incorrect in that it may lead to getting the wrong cookie:
c_start = document.cookie.indexOf(c_name + "=");
If you go looking for a cookie named foo
(which we'll suppose is an existing cookie) then somewhere in document.cookie
will be the string foo=bar
.
However, there's no guarantee there won't also be the string xfoo=something
. Notice that this still contains the substring foo=
so the w3schools code will find it. And if the xfoo
cookie happens to be listed first, you'll get back the something
value (incorrectly!) instead of the expected bar
.
Given the choice between two pieces of code, never go with the one that's fundamentally broken.
All of the code shown above is BROKEN. The two common problems are (1) the getcookie function may return the wrong value if one cookie name is a proper suffix of another cookie name; and (2) the setcookie function does not protect the cookie value, which means that if the cookie value includes (for example) a ";" then all the cookies are corrupted and cannot be parsed.
TL;DR Use this well-written library instead: https://github.com/js-cookie/js-cookie