JAX-RS Post multiple objects
The answer is no.
The reason is simple: This about the parameters you can receive in a method. They must be related to the request. Right? So they must be either headers or cookies or query parameters or matrix parameters or path parameters or request body. (Just to tell the complete story there is additional types of parameters called context).
Now, when you receive JSON object in your request, you receive it in a request body. How many bodies the request may have? One and only one. So you can receive only one JSON object.
You can not use your method like this as correctly stated by Tarlog.
However, you can do this:
@POST
@Path("test")
@Consumes(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
public void test(List<ObjectOne> objects)
or this:
@POST
@Path("test")
@Consumes(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
public void test(BeanWithObjectOneAndObjectTwo containerObject)
Furthermore, you can always combine your method with GET parameters:
@POST
@Path("test")
@Consumes(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
public void test(List<ObjectOne> objects, @QueryParam("objectTwoId") long objectTwoId)
The next approach is usually applied in this kind of cases:
TransferObject {
ObjectOne objectOne;
ObjectTwo objectTwo;
//getters/setters
}
@POST
@Path("test")
@Consumes(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
public void test(TransferObject object){
// object.getObejctOne()....
}
If we look at what the OP is trying to do, he/she is trying to post two (possibly unrelated) JSON objects. First any solution to try and send one part as the body, and one part as some other param, IMO, are horrible solutions. POST data should go in the body. It's not right to do something just because it works. Some work-arounds might be violating basic REST principles.
I see a few solutions
- Use application/x-www-form-urlencoded
- Use Multipart
- Just wrap them in a single parent object
1. Use application/x-www-form-urlencoded
Another option is to just use application/x-www-form-urlencoded. We can actually have JSON values. For examle
curl -v http://localhost:8080/api/model \
-d 'one={"modelOne":"helloone"}' \
-d 'two={"modelTwo":"hellotwo"}'
public class ModelOne {
public String modelOne;
}
public class ModelTwo {
public String modelTwo;
}
@Path("model")
public class ModelResource {
@POST
@Consumes(MediaType.APPLICATION_FORM_URLENCODED)
public String post(@FormParam("one") ModelOne modelOne,
@FormParam("two") ModelTwo modelTwo) {
return modelOne.modelOne + ":" + modelTwo.modelTwo;
}
}
The one thing we need to get this to work is a ParamConverterProvider to get this to work. Below is one that has been implemented by Michal Gadjos of the Jersey Team (found here with explanation).
@Provider
public class JacksonJsonParamConverterProvider implements ParamConverterProvider {
@Context
private Providers providers;
@Override
public <T> ParamConverter<T> getConverter(final Class<T> rawType,
final Type genericType,
final Annotation[] annotations) {
// Check whether we can convert the given type with Jackson.
final MessageBodyReader<T> mbr = providers.getMessageBodyReader(rawType,
genericType, annotations, MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_TYPE);
if (mbr == null
|| !mbr.isReadable(rawType, genericType, annotations, MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_TYPE)) {
return null;
}
// Obtain custom ObjectMapper for special handling.
final ContextResolver<ObjectMapper> contextResolver = providers
.getContextResolver(ObjectMapper.class, MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_TYPE);
final ObjectMapper mapper = contextResolver != null ?
contextResolver.getContext(rawType) : new ObjectMapper();
// Create ParamConverter.
return new ParamConverter<T>() {
@Override
public T fromString(final String value) {
try {
return mapper.reader(rawType).readValue(value);
} catch (IOException e) {
throw new ProcessingException(e);
}
}
@Override
public String toString(final T value) {
try {
return mapper.writer().writeValueAsString(value);
} catch (JsonProcessingException e) {
throw new ProcessingException(e);
}
}
};
}
}
If you aren't scanning for resource and providers, just register this provider, and the above example should work.
2. Use Multipart
One solution that no one has mentioned, is to use multipart. This allows us to send arbitrary parts in a request. Since each request can only have one entity body, multipart is the work around, as it allows to have different parts (with their own content types) as part of the entity body.
Here is an example using Jersey (see official doc here)
Dependency
<dependency>
<groupId>org.glassfish.jersey.media</groupId>
<artifactId>jersey-media-multipart</artifactId>
<version>${jersey-2.x.version}</version>
</dependency>
Register the MultipartFeature
import javax.ws.rs.ApplicationPath;
import org.glassfish.jersey.media.multipart.MultiPartFeature;
import org.glassfish.jersey.server.ResourceConfig;
@ApplicationPath("/api")
public class JerseyApplication extends ResourceConfig {
public JerseyApplication() {
packages("stackoverflow.jersey");
register(MultiPartFeature.class);
}
}
Resource class
import javax.ws.rs.Consumes;
import javax.ws.rs.POST;
import javax.ws.rs.Path;
import javax.ws.rs.core.MediaType;
import javax.ws.rs.core.Response;
import org.glassfish.jersey.media.multipart.FormDataParam;
@Path("foobar")
public class MultipartResource {
@POST
@Consumes(MediaType.MULTIPART_FORM_DATA)
public Response postFooBar(@FormDataParam("foo") Foo foo,
@FormDataParam("bar") Bar bar) {
String response = foo.foo + "; " + bar.bar;
return Response.ok(response).build();
}
public static class Foo {
public String foo;
}
public static class Bar {
public String bar;
}
}
Now the tricky part with some clients is that there isn't a way to set the Content-Type of each body part, which is required for the above to work. The multipart provider will look up message body reader, based on the type of each part. If it's not set to application/json or a type, the Foo or Bar has a reader for, this will fail. We will use JSON here. There's no extra configuration but to have a reader available. I'll use Jackson. With the below dependency, no other configuration should be required, as the provider will be discovered through classpath scanning.
<dependency>
<groupId>org.glassfish.jersey.media</groupId>
<artifactId>jersey-media-json-jackson</artifactId>
<version>${jersey-2.x.version}</version>
</dependency>
Now the test. I will be using cURL. You can see I explicitly set the Content-Type for each part with type. The -F signifies to different part. (See very bottom of the post for an idea of how the request body actually looks.)
curl -v -X POST \ -H "Content-Type:multipart/form-data" \ -F "bar={\"bar\":\"BarBar\"};type=application/json" \ -F "foo={\"foo\":\"FooFoo\"};type=application/json" \ http://localhost:8080/api/foobar
Result:FooFoo; BarBar
The result is exactly as we expected. If you look at the resource method, all we do is return this string foo.foo + "; " + bar.bar, gathered from the two JSON objects.
You can see some examples using some different JAX-RS clients, in the links below. You will also see some server side example also from those different JAX-RS implementations. Each link should have somewhere in it a link to the official documentation for that implementation
- Jersey example
- Resteasy example
- CXF example
There are other JAX-RS implementations out there, but you will need to find the documentation for it yourself. The above three are the only ones I have experience with.
As far as Javascript clients, most of the example I see (e.g. some of these involve setting the Content-Type to undefined/false (using FormData), letting the Browser handle the it. But this will not work for us, as the Browser will not set the Content-Type for each part. And the default type is text/plain.
I'm sure there are libraries out there that allow setting the type for each part, but just to show you how it can be done manually, I'll post an example (got a little help from here. I'll be using Angular, but the grunt work of building the entity body will be plain old Javascript.
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html ng-app="multipartApp">
<head>
<script src="js/libs/angular.js/angular.js"></script>
<script>
angular.module("multipartApp", [])
.controller("defaultCtrl", function($scope, $http) {
$scope.sendData = function() {
var foo = JSON.stringify({foo: "FooFoo"});
var bar = JSON.stringify({bar: "BarBar"});
var boundary = Math.random().toString().substr(2);
var header = "multipart/form-data; charset=utf-8; boundary=" + boundary;
$http({
url: "/api/foobar",
headers: { "Content-Type": header },
data: createRequest(foo, bar, boundary),
method: "POST"
}).then(function(response) {
$scope.result = response.data;
});
};
function createRequest(foo, bar, boundary) {
var multipart = "";
multipart += "--" + boundary
+ "\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name=foo"
+ "\r\nContent-type: application/json"
+ "\r\n\r\n" + foo + "\r\n";
multipart += "--" + boundary
+ "\r\nContent-Disposition: form-data; name=bar"
+ "\r\nContent-type: application/json"
+ "\r\n\r\n" + bar + "\r\n";
multipart += "--" + boundary + "--\r\n";
return multipart;
}
});
</script>
</head>
<body>
<div ng-controller="defaultCtrl">
<button ng-click="sendData()">Send</button>
<p>{{result}}</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
The interesting part is the createRequest function. This is where we build the multipart, setting the Content-Type of each part to application/json, and concatenating the stringified foo and bar objects to each part. If you are unfamiliar multipart format see here for more info. The other interesting part is the header. We set it to multipart/form-data.
Below is the result. In Angular I just used the result to show in the HTML, with $scope.result = response.data. The button you see was just to make the request. You will also see the request data in firebug
3. Just wrap them in a single parent object
This option should be self explanatory, as others have already mentioned.