JOIN queries vs multiple queries

For inner joins, a single query makes sense, since you only get matching rows. For left joins, multiple queries is much better... look at the following benchmark I did:

  1. Single query with 5 Joins

    query: 8.074508 seconds

    result size: 2268000

  2. 5 queries in a row

    combined query time: 0.00262 seconds

    result size: 165 (6 + 50 + 7 + 12 + 90)

.

Note that we get the same results in both cases (6 x 50 x 7 x 12 x 90 = 2268000)

left joins use exponentially more memory with redundant data.

The memory limit might not be as bad if you only do a join of two tables, but generally three or more and it becomes worth different queries.

As a side note, my MySQL server is right beside my application server... so connection time is negligible. If your connection time is in the seconds, then maybe there is a benefit

Frank


This is way too vague to give you an answer relevant to your specific case. It depends on a lot of things. Jeff Atwood (founder of this site) actually wrote about this. For the most part, though, if you have the right indexes and you properly do your JOINs it is usually going to be faster to do 1 trip than several.