linear regression "NA" estimate just for last coefficient

You are getting NA for the last variable because it is linearly dependent on the other 11 variables. R's lm function (and all properly constructed R regression functions as well) will automatically exclude linearly dependent variables for you. That's handled in the model.matrix function. If all of the other variables are 0, then December will be 1. It is related to the exclusion of the lowest term of a factor, but not exactly the same.

There are probably better ways to do this.

As for where to get the information from December? ... It's in the '(Intercept)' term. If you want to have all of the levels labeled as you expect them, try adding either -1 or +0 to the formula and you will see December emerge magically from the mists.


You have to think a bit more about how your model is defined.

Here's your approach (edited for readability):

> set.seed(101)
> dat<-data.frame(one=c(sample(1000:1239)),
                 two=c(sample(200:439)),
                 three=c(sample(600:839)),
                 Jan=c(rep(1,20),rep(0,220)),
                 Feb=c(rep(0,20),rep(1,20),rep(0,200)),
                 Mar=c(rep(0,40),rep(1,20),rep(0,180)),
                 Apr=c(rep(0,60),rep(1,20),rep(0,160)),
                 May=c(rep(0,80),rep(1,20),rep(0,140)),
                 Jun=c(rep(0,100),rep(1,20),rep(0,120)),
                 Jul=c(rep(0,120),rep(1,20),rep(0,100)),
                 Aug=c(rep(0,140),rep(1,20),rep(0,80)),
                 Sep=c(rep(0,160),rep(1,20),rep(0,60)),
                 Oct=c(rep(0,180),rep(1,20),rep(0,40)),
                 Nov=c(rep(0,200),rep(1,20),rep(0,20)),
                 Dec=c(rep(0,220),rep(1,20)))
> summary(lm(one ~ two + three + Jan + Feb + Mar + Apr + 
         May + Jun + Jul + Aug + Sep + Oct + Nov + Dec,
            data=dat))

And the answers:

[snip]
Coefficients: (1 not defined because of singularities)

note this line, it indicates that R (and any other statistical package you choose to use) can't estimate all the parameters because the predictor variables are not all linearly independent.

              Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)    
(Intercept) 1149.55556   53.52499  21.477   <2e-16 ***

The intercept here represents the predicted value when all predictor variables are zero. In any particular case the interpretation of the intercept depends on how you have parameterized your model. The dummy variables you have defined for month are not all linearly independent; lm is smart enough to detect this and drop some of the unidentifiable (linearly dependent) predictor variables. The details of which particular predictor(s) are discarded in this case are obscure and technical (you would probably have to look inside the lm.fit function, but you probably don't want to do this). In this case, R decides to throw away the December predictor. Therefore, if we set all the predictors (two, three, and all month dummies Jan-Nov) to zero, we end up with the expected value when two=0 and three=0 and when the month is not equal to any of Jan-Nov -- i.e., the expected value for December.

two           -0.09670    0.06621  -1.460   0.1455    
three          0.02446    0.06666   0.367   0.7141    
Jan          -19.49744   22.17404  -0.879   0.3802    
Feb          -28.22652   22.27438  -1.267   0.2064    
Mar           -6.05246   22.25468  -0.272   0.7859    
Apr           -5.60192   22.41204  -0.250   0.8029    
May          -13.19127   22.34289  -0.590   0.5555    
Jun          -19.69547   22.14274  -0.889   0.3747    
Jul          -44.45511   22.20837  -2.002   0.0465 *  
Aug           -2.08404   22.26202  -0.094   0.9255    
Sep          -10.13351   22.10252  -0.458   0.6470    
Oct          -31.80482   22.33335  -1.424   0.1558    
Nov          -20.35348   22.09953  -0.921   0.3580    
Dec                 NA         NA      NA       NA    
---
Signif. codes:  0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 

Residual standard error: 69.81 on 226 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 0.04381,    Adjusted R-squared: -0.01119 
F-statistic: 0.7966 on 13 and 226 DF,  p-value: 0.6635

Now do it again, this time setting up a model formula that uses -1 to discard the intercept term (we reset the random seed for reproducibility):

> set.seed(101)
> dat1 <- data.frame(one=c(sample(1000:1239)),two=c(sample(200:439)),
      three=c(sample(600:839)),
                    month=factor(rep(month.abb,each=20),levels=month.abb))
> summary(lm(one ~ two + three + month-1, data=dat1))

    Coefficients:
           Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)    
two        -0.09670    0.06621  -1.460    0.146    
three       0.02446    0.06666   0.367    0.714

The estimates for two and three are the same as before.

monthJan 1130.05812   52.79625  21.404   <2e-16 ***
monthFeb 1121.32904   55.18864  20.318   <2e-16 ***
monthMar 1143.50310   53.59603  21.336   <2e-16 ***
monthApr 1143.95365   54.99724  20.800   <2e-16 ***
monthMay 1136.36429   53.38218  21.287   <2e-16 ***
monthJun 1129.86010   53.85865  20.978   <2e-16 ***
monthJul 1105.10045   54.94940  20.111   <2e-16 ***
monthAug 1147.47152   54.57201  21.027   <2e-16 ***
monthSep 1139.42205   53.58611  21.263   <2e-16 ***
monthOct 1117.75075   55.35703  20.192   <2e-16 ***
monthNov 1129.20208   53.54934  21.087   <2e-16 ***
monthDec 1149.55556   53.52499  21.477   <2e-16 ***

The estimate for December is the same as the intercept estimate above. The other months' parameter estimates are equal to (intercept+previous value). The p values are different, because their meaning has changed. Previously, they were a test of differences of each month from December; now they are a test of the differences of each month from a baseline value of zero.

Tags:

R

Recent Posts