Many vertical alignment problems with tabu table
The spacing
tabu
, as most other table packages, has some problem with spacing, especially when you are using list
-environments. Therefore, we all longing for v 2.9. Try using \tabulinesep=1.3mm
and remove the nolistsep
from the two first listings (or give topsep=
a small value (f.ex. 0.1ex). After \textit{Operation selector}
put a \newline
. Listings in tables are challenging.
I have tinkered a bit more with your code. The bad spacing around lists are not tabu
’s fault, but the itemize
-environment adding, in this setting, unnecessary space. I solved this by including the itemize
-environment in a 5 cm wide \parbox
and reducing the topsep
to 0.1ex. If you have necessary skills, you may read the width of the fourth column from the .aux
-file.
The problem with the heading is your setting of column 2 and 3. It is too narrow. I increased the width of these columns and the headings lined up. As @hakaze point out, only the last column need to be a X
column; the cells in the three first columns are only one line. Use ordinary l
- and c
-columns instead, and the headings line up nicely.
I also added a \strut
to the first column, giving the heading more depth.
Complicated table is difficult, and you have to be prepared for fine tuning whatever package you are using.
Here is the code for a new MWE:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{tabu}
\usepackage{xcolor,colortbl}
\usepackage{enumitem}
\usepackage[overload]{ragged2e}
\begin{document}
\tabulinesep=3pt
\tabulinestyle{1pt blue}
\begin{tabu}[m]{
|[1pt blue] l % or X[2.5,m]
|[1pt gray] c % or X[2mc]
|[1pt gray] l % or X[2m]
|[1pt gray] X[8,lm] % I suggest you set the column ragged right
|[1pt blue] } \everyrow{\extrarowsep=^2pt\tabucline[1pt gray]-}
\rowfont[C]{\bf\large\color{white}} \rowcolor{blue} \strut Port & Width & Type & Description \\
OperandA & Mode & Input &
Operand A \\
OperandB & Mode & Input &
Operand B in IEEE format and some constraints \\
Mode & 3 & Input &
\parbox{5cm}{\begin{itemize}[topsep=0.1ex,noitemsep,leftmargin=1em]
\item 000 Round to
\item 001 Round away
\item 010 Round toward
\item 011 Round toward minus
\item 100 Round Toward
\item 101 Round to nearest
\item 110 Round to nearest
\item 111 Reserved
\end{itemize}}
\\
Precision & 1 & Input &
\parbox{5cm}{\begin{itemize}[topsep=0.1ex,noitemsep,leftmargin=1em]
\item 1 Enable 64 operand
\item 0 Enable 128 operand
\end{itemize}} \\
Oper & 1 & Input & \textit{Operation selector}:\newline
\parbox{5cm}{\begin{itemize}[topsep=0.1ex,noitemsep,leftmargin=1em]
\item 100 bla
\item 101 blaaa
\item 000
\item 110
\item 111
\item 001
\item 010
\item 011
\end{itemize}} \\
Condition & 5 & Input &
\textit{Comparison condition selector}:
The valid combination are seen in standard-defined Comparisons \\
\multicolumn{4}{|c|}{Clock, Reset, and Enable are relevant only to pipelined designs} \\
Clock & 1 & Input & System Clock (relevant only to pipelined designs) \\
Reset & 1 & Input & System Asynchronous Reset, active low \\
Enable & 1 & Input & \textit{System Enable}. When Enable = 0, the Clock and Reset inputs are held \\ \tabucline[1pt blue]-\end{tabu}
\end{document}
The output:
- i would not use
tabu
. it is not maintained, and not compatible with recent changes inarray
which can cause unexpected problems - with
booktabbs
,cellspace
andtabularx
you can design nice, more professional look table. well a bit less fancy colored (what i consider as an advantage).
edit:
i remove local settings of the itemize
lists and simplify column definitions. let me noted, that use cellspace
in X
column interact with vertical spaces around itemize
.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[overload]{ragged2e}
\usepackage{booktabs, cellspace, tabularx}
\setlength\cellspacetoplimit{5pt}
\setlength\cellspacebottomlimit{5pt}
\addparagraphcolumntypes{X}
\usepackage[table]{xcolor}
\usepackage{enumitem}
\begin{document}
\begin{table}[htb]
\setlist[itemize]{nosep,label=$\bullet$,before=\vspace{-0.5\baselineskip}}
\begin{tabularx}{\linewidth}{l c l
>{\RaggedRight} S{X}
}
\hline
\rowcolor{blue!30}
\textbf{Port} & \textbf{Width} & \textbf{Type} & \textbf{Description} \\
\hline
OperandA & Mode & Input & Operand A \\
\midrule
OperandB & Mode & Input & Operand B in IEEE format
and some constraints \\
\midrule
Mode & 3 & Input & \begin{itemize}
\item 000 Round to
\item 001 Round away
\item 010 Round toward
\item 011 Round toward minus
\item 100 Round Toward
\item 101 Round to nearest
\item 110 Round to nearest
\item 111 Reserved
\end{itemize} \\
\midrule
Precision & 1 & Input & \begin{itemize}
\item 1 Enable 64 operand
\item 0 Enable 128 operand
\end{itemize} \\
\midrule
Oper & 1 & Input & \textit{Operation selector}:
\medskip
\begin{itemize}
\item 100 bla
\item 101 blaaa
\item 000
\item 110
\item 111
\item 001
\item 010
\item 011
\end{itemize} \\
\midrule
Condition & 5 & Input & \textit{Comparison condition selector}:
The valid combination are seen in standard-defined Comparisons \\
\midrule
\multicolumn{4}{l}{Clock, Reset, and Enable are relevant only to pipelined designs} \\
\midrule
Clock & 1 & Input & System Clock (relevant only to pipelined designs) \\
Reset & 1 & Input & System Asynchronous Reset, active low \\
Enable & 1 & Input & \textit{System Enable}. When Enable = 0, the Clock and Reset inputs are held \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabularx}
\end{table}
\end{document}