Most Pythonic way to provide global configuration variables in config.py?
How about just using the built-in types like this:
config = {
"mysql": {
"user": "root",
"pass": "secret",
"tables": {
"users": "tb_users"
}
# etc
}
}
You'd access the values as follows:
config["mysql"]["tables"]["users"]
If you are willing to sacrifice the potential to compute expressions inside your config tree, you could use YAML and end up with a more readable config file like this:
mysql:
- user: root
- pass: secret
- tables:
- users: tb_users
and use a library like PyYAML to conventiently parse and access the config file
I like this solution for small applications:
class App:
__conf = {
"username": "",
"password": "",
"MYSQL_PORT": 3306,
"MYSQL_DATABASE": 'mydb',
"MYSQL_DATABASE_TABLES": ['tb_users', 'tb_groups']
}
__setters = ["username", "password"]
@staticmethod
def config(name):
return App.__conf[name]
@staticmethod
def set(name, value):
if name in App.__setters:
App.__conf[name] = value
else:
raise NameError("Name not accepted in set() method")
And then usage is:
if __name__ == "__main__":
# from config import App
App.config("MYSQL_PORT") # return 3306
App.set("username", "hi") # set new username value
App.config("username") # return "hi"
App.set("MYSQL_PORT", "abc") # this raises NameError
.. you should like it because:
- uses class variables (no object to pass around/ no singleton required),
- uses encapsulated built-in types and looks like (is) a method call on
App
, - has control over individual config immutability, mutable globals are the worst kind of globals.
- promotes conventional and well named access / readability in your source code
- is a simple class but enforces structured access, an alternative is to use
@property
, but that requires more variable handling code per item and is object-based. - requires minimal changes to add new config items and set its mutability.
--Edit--: For large applications, storing values in a YAML (i.e. properties) file and reading that in as immutable data is a better approach (i.e. blubb/ohaal's answer). For small applications, this solution above is simpler.