Multiprocessing vs Threading Python
The threading
module uses threads, the multiprocessing
module uses processes. The difference is that threads run in the same memory space, while processes have separate memory. This makes it a bit harder to share objects between processes with multiprocessing. Since threads use the same memory, precautions have to be taken or two threads will write to the same memory at the same time. This is what the global interpreter lock is for.
Spawning processes is a bit slower than spawning threads.
Here are some pros/cons I came up with.
Multiprocessing
Pros
- Separate memory space
- Code is usually straightforward
- Takes advantage of multiple CPUs & cores
- Avoids GIL limitations for cPython
- Eliminates most needs for synchronization primitives unless if you use shared memory (instead, it's more of a communication model for IPC)
- Child processes are interruptible/killable
- Python
multiprocessing
module includes useful abstractions with an interface much likethreading.Thread
- A must with cPython for CPU-bound processing
Cons
- IPC a little more complicated with more overhead (communication model vs. shared memory/objects)
- Larger memory footprint
Threading
Pros
- Lightweight - low memory footprint
- Shared memory - makes access to state from another context easier
- Allows you to easily make responsive UIs
- cPython C extension modules that properly release the GIL will run in parallel
- Great option for I/O-bound applications
Cons
- cPython - subject to the GIL
- Not interruptible/killable
- If not following a command queue/message pump model (using the
Queue
module), then manual use of synchronization primitives become a necessity (decisions are needed for the granularity of locking) - Code is usually harder to understand and to get right - the potential for race conditions increases dramatically