Read PDF using itextsharp where PDF language is non-English
I inspected your file with a special focus on your sample "मतद|र" being extracted as "मतदरर" in the topmost line of the document pages.
In a nutshell:
Your document itself provides the information that e.g. the glyphs "मतद|र" in the head line represent the text "मतदरर". You should ask the source of your document for a document version in which the font informations are not misleading. If that is not possible, you should go for OCR.
In detail:
The top line of the first page is generated by the following operations in the page content stream:
/9 280 Tf
(-12"!%$"234%56*5) Tj
The first line selects the font named /9 at a size of 280 (an operation at the beginning of the page scales everything by a factor of 0.05; thus, the effective size is 14 units which you observe in the file).
The second line causes glyphs to be printed. These glyphs are referenced inbetween the brackets using the custom encoding of that font.
When a program tries to extract the text, it has to deduce the actual characters from these glyph references using information from the font.
The font /9 on the first page of your PDF is defined using these objects:
242 0 obj<<
/Type/Font/Name/9/BaseFont 243 0 R/FirstChar 33/LastChar 94
/Subtype/TrueType/ToUnicode 244 0 R/FontDescriptor 247 0 R/Widths 248 0 R>>
endobj
243 0 obj/CDAC-GISTSurekh-Bold+0
endobj
247 0 obj<<
/Type/FontDescriptor/FontFile2 245 0 R/FontBBox 246 0 R/FontName 243 0 R
/Flags 4/MissingWidth 946/StemV 0/StemH 0/CapHeight 500/XHeight 0
/Ascent 1050/Descent -400/Leading 0/MaxWidth 1892/AvgWidth 946/ItalicAngle 0>>
endobj
So there is no /Encoding element but at least there is a reference to a /ToUnicode map. Thus, a program extracting text has to rely on the given /ToUnicode mapping.
The stream referenced by /ToUnicode contains the following mappings of interest when extracting the text from (-12"!%$"234%56*5):
<21> <21> <0930>
<22> <22> <0930>
<24> <24> <091c>
<25> <25> <0020>
<2a> <2a> <0031>
<2d> <2d> <092e>
<31> <31> <0924>
<32> <32> <0926>
<33> <33> <0926>
<34> <34> <002c>
<35> <35> <0032>
<36> <36> <0030>
(Already here you can see that multiple character codes are mapped to the same unicode code point...)
Thus, text extraction must result in:
- = 0x2d -> 0x092e = म
1 = 0x31 -> 0x0924 = त
2 = 0x32 -> 0x0926 = द
" = 0x22 -> 0x0930 = र instead of |
! = 0x21 -> 0x0930 = र
% = 0x25 -> 0x0020 =
$ = 0x24 -> 0x091c = ज
" = 0x22 -> 0x0930 = र
2 = 0x32 -> 0x0926 = द
3 = 0x33 -> 0x0926 = द
4 = 0x34 -> 0x002c = ,
% = 0x25 -> 0x0020 =
5 = 0x35 -> 0x0032 = 2
6 = 0x36 -> 0x0030 = 0
* = 0x2a -> 0x0031 = 1
5 = 0x35 -> 0x0032 = 2
Thus, the text iTextSharp (and also Adobe Reader!) extract from the heading on the first document page is exactly what the document in its font informations claims is correct.
As the cause for this is the misleading mapping information in the font definition, it is not surprising that there are misinterpretations all over the document.
As @mkl said, we'll need more information as to why things aren't working. But I can tell you a couple of things that might help you.
First, SimpleTextExtractionStrategy
is very simple. If you read the docs for it you'll see that:
If the PDF renders text in a non-top-to-bottom fashion, this will result in the text not being a true representation of how it appears in the PDF
What that means is that although a PDF may look like it should be read from top to bottom, it may have been written in a different order. The PDF you referenced actually has the second visual line written first. See my post here for a slightly smarter text extraction strategy that tries to return text top to bottom. When I run my code against the first page of your PDF it appears to pull out each "line" correctly.
Second, PDFs don't have a concept of tables. They just have text and lines drawn at certain locations and neither of these are related to each other. What that means is that you would need to calculate each and every line and build your own concept of a table, you won't find any code within iTextSharp that does this for you. I personally wouldn't even bother trying to write one.
Third, the text extraction is for pulling text which has nothing to do with fonts. If you want that you'll have to build that logic in yourself. See my post here for a very basic start at it.