Return recursive lambda from function in C++
If fibonacci (line 2) is a local of the
makeFibonacci()
function, and therefore goes out of scope when the function exits, how can it be captured by reference and used recursively?
It's just chance that the function is working as expected. What you have is undefined behavior. You are referencing an object that goes out of scope in the function.
Also, why does the program segfault when I capture the lambda by copy?
This happens because of how the std::function
is initialized. The lambda is initialized first, the std::function
is initialized with the lambda afterwards. Which means that you are copying an instance of std::function
that is not initialized, and therefore it is probably not in a state which can allow good copies. Invariants are broken inside, which are likely causing the segmentation fault.
You can make a recursive lambda function more efficiently without std::function
by using a polymorphic lambda as follows
auto makeFibonacci() {
auto fib = [](int n, auto& self) {
if (n == 1) {
return 1;
}
if (n == 2) {
return 1;
}
return self(n - 1, self) + self(n - 2, self);
};
return [fib](int n) {
return fib(n, fib);
};
};
Here the lambda owns all the state it needs. You can then use it like this
auto fibonacci = makeFibonacci();
cout << fibonacci(6) << endl;
Also note that this is probably the worst way to calculate fibonacci numbers.
When you capture by reference, your program has Undefined Behaviour, as the reference becomes dangling. It happens to work as expected in your case, but that's purely by accident.
When you change to capture by copy, it segfaults because at the time of capture, fibonacci
is not yet constructed, so the copy constructor called during the capture is attempting to copy from an uninitialised object: Undefined Behaviour again.
I don't think there is a way to return a recursive lambda from a function (such that it would not require additional parameters). The answer by @Curious shows how you can return a recursive lambda, using C++14 or newer. In C++1, if you really need a recursive functor, you can write a dedicated class for it.
Side note: computing Fibonacci numbers using recursion is pretty much impossible in any practical scenario, since the quadratic recursion tree grows extremely quickly. I understand this was probably just an example, but still.