Set of diameter $\le 1$ contained in set of constant width $1$

Let $X\subseteq\mathbf{R}^2$ be of diameter $d(X)\le 1$, w.l.o.g. we can assume $X$ to be closed. I attempt to show that there exists $a\in\mathbf{R}^2$ such that with $b:=a+(1,0)$ we have $d(X\subseteq\{a,b\})\le 1$. This way we can add pairs of points with distance $1$ along every rational angle, which should suffice to get a superset of $X$ with constant width $1$. In the following, $b$, $b'$, etc. always means $a+(1,0)$, $a'+(1,0)$, etc.

[EDIT] Look in the comments for a shorter approach that doesn't use the following section.

First choose $a$ such that we have $$d(X\cup\{a,b\})=\min_{a'\in\mathbf{R}}d(X\cup\{a',b'\}),$$ call this diameter $D$. Assume there is some $a'\neq a$ with the same property. Then all points on the line between $a$ and $a'$ must have this property as well, as when you travel in a direction and the distance to some point grows, it will not shrink again when you travel further in the same direction. Assume $1<D$. Then there exists $x\in X$ such that $D$ equals the distance from $x$ to $(a+a')/2$ (or just any other point strictly between $a$ and $a'$). But this implies $D<d(x,a)$ or $D<d(x,a')$, a contradiction. So if $1<D$ then our $a$ must be unique.

Now assume w.l.o.g. that $a=(-1/2,0)$, $b=(1/2,0)$. Consider the set $E$ of points $e$ such that $D=d(\{a,b,e\})$, I called it $E$ because it has the shape of a vertical eye, note that $X$ must live in $E$ together with its enclosed area. For $s,s'\in\{-,+,*\}$ denote by $E_{s,s'}$ the set of points $e\in E$ such that the sign of the first component is $s$ or $0$ or anything if $s=*$ and similar for the sign of the second component with $s'$. When we shift $a$ to the right a little, the diameter of $X\cup\{a,b\}$ increases, so $X\cap(E_{-,*})$ cannot be empty. A similar argument can be made for $E_{+,*}$ and by shifting $a$ vertically also for $E_{*,-}$ and $E_{*,+}$. So there must be two points of $X$ in two opposite components of $E$ (i.e. $E_{-,+}$ / $E_{+,-}$ or $E_{-,-}$ / $E_{+,+}$), and one can easily see that those have distance greater than $1$, a contradiction.