New posts in Peer Review

Marking a journal paper as “Minor revisions needed” for minor typos?

Why and how commonly are scientists concerned about open peer review?

How much should reviewers care about other things than an article's content?

Why call it a "major" revision if the suggested changes are seemingly minor?

Which review recommendation should I give to maximize the likelihood that a manuscript is rejected?

Is it accepted/common to answer factually inaccurate reviewer comments in case of rejection?

Colleague stole my work and is publishing it as his own; my PhD supervisor supports him; I got the paper to review. How to proceed?

Can a rejected manuscript be submitted to another Elsevier journal?

Paper getting rejected from many journals after no proper review - What could be the problem?

Do I have to adapt my reviews according to the quality of a journal?