This message is flooding my syslog, how to find where it comes from?
The existing answer is correct in its technical analysis of the firewall log entry, but it's missing one point that makes the conclusion incorrect. The packet
- Is a
RST
(reset) packet - from
SRC=35.162.106.154
- to your host at
DST=104.248.41.4
- via
TCP
- from his port
SPT=25
- to your port
DPT=50616
- and has been
BLOCK
ed by UFW.
Port 25 (the source port) is commonly used for email. Port 50616 is in the ephemeral port range, meaning there's no consistent user for this port. A TCP "reset" packet can be sent in response to a number of unexpected situations, such as data arriving after a connection has been closed, or data being sent without first establishing a connection.
35.162.106.154
reverse-resolves to cxr.mx.a.cloudfilter.net
, a domain used by the CloudMark email filtering service.
Your computer, or someone pretending to be your computer, is sending data to one of CloudMark's servers. The data is arriving unexpectedly, and the server is responding with a RST
to ask the sending computer to stop. Given that the firewall is dropping the RST
rather than passing it through to some application, the data that's causing the RST
to be sent isn't coming from your computer. Instead, you're probably seeing backscatter from a denial-of-service attack, where the attacker is sending out floods of packets with forged "from" addresses in an attempt to knock CloudMark's mail servers offline (perhaps to make spamming more effective).
The messages stems from UFW, the "uncomplicated firewall" and it tells you that someone
- from
SRC=35.162.106.154
- tried to connect to your host at
DST=104.248.41.4
- via
TCP
- from their port
SPT=25
- to your port
DPT=50616
- and that UFW has successfully
BLOCK
ed that attempt.
According to this site the source address 35.162.106.154 is some Amazon machine (probably an AWS). According to this site the port 50616 may be used for Xsan Filesystem Access.
So it's an attempt from IP=35.162.106.154 to access your files. Quite normal and nothing to be really worried about because that's what firewalls are for: rejecting such attempts.