TSQL md5 hash different to C# .NET md5

If you are dealing with NVARCHAR / NCHAR data (which is stored as UTF-16 Little Endian), then you would use the Unicode encoding, not BigEndianUnicode. In .NET, UTF-16 is called Unicode while other Unicode encodings are referred to by their actual names: UTF7, UTF8, and UTF32. Hence, Unicode by itself is Little Endian as opposed to BigEndianUnicode. UPDATE: Please see the section at the end regarding UCS-2 and Supplementary Characters.

On the database side:

SELECT HASHBYTES('MD5', N'è') AS [HashBytesNVARCHAR]
-- FAC02CD988801F0495D35611223782CF

On the .NET side:

System.Text.Encoding.ASCII.GetBytes("è")
// D1457B72C3FB323A2671125AEF3EAB5D

System.Text.Encoding.UTF7.GetBytes("è")
// F63A0999FE759C5054613DDE20346193

System.Text.Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes("è")
// 0A35E149DBBB2D10D744BF675C7744B1

System.Text.Encoding.UTF32.GetBytes("è")
// 86D29922AC56CF022B639187828137F8

System.Text.Encoding.BigEndianUnicode.GetBytes("è")
// 407256AC97E4C5AEBCA825DEB3D2E89C

System.Text.Encoding.Unicode.GetBytes("è")  // this one matches HASHBYTES('MD5', N'è')
// FAC02CD988801F0495D35611223782CF

However, this question pertains to VARCHAR / CHAR data, which is ASCII, and so things are a bit more complicated.

On the database side:

SELECT HASHBYTES('MD5', 'è') AS [HashBytesVARCHAR]
-- 785D512BE4316D578E6650613B45E934

We already see the .NET side above. From those hashed values there should be two questions:

  • Why don't any of them match the HASHBYTES value?
  • Why does the "sqlteam.com" article linked in @Eric J.'s answer show that three of them (ASCII, UTF7, and UTF8) all match the HASHBYTES value?

There is one answer that covers both questions: Code Pages. The test done in the "sqlteam" article used "safe" ASCII characters that are in the 0 - 127 range (in terms of the int / decimal value) that do not vary between Code Pages. But the 128 - 255 range -- where we find the "è" character -- is the Extended set that does vary by Code Page (which makes sense as this is the reason for having Code Pages).

Now try:

SELECT HASHBYTES('MD5', 'è' COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1255_CI_AS) AS [HashBytes]
-- D1457B72C3FB323A2671125AEF3EAB5D

That matches the ASCII hashed value (and again, because the "sqlteam" article / test used values in the 0 - 127 range, they did not see any changes when using COLLATE). Great, now we finally found a way to match VARCHAR / CHAR data. All good?

Well, not really. Let's take a look-see at what we were actually hashing:

SELECT 'è' AS [TheChar],
       ASCII('è') AS [TheASCIIvalue],
       'è' COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1255_CI_AS AS [CharCP1255],
       ASCII('è' COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1255_CI_AS) AS [TheASCIIvalueCP1255];

Returns:

TheChar TheASCIIvalue   CharCP1255  TheASCIIvalueCP1255
è       232             ?           63

A ? ? Just to verify, run:

SELECT CHAR(63) AS [WhatIs63?];
-- ?

Ah, so Code Page 1255 doesn't have the è character, so it gets translated as everyone's favorite ?. But then why did that match the MD5 hashed value in .NET when using the ASCII encoding? Could it be that we weren't actually matching the hashed value of è, but instead were matching the hashed value of ?:

SELECT HASHBYTES('MD5', '?') AS [HashBytesVARCHAR]
-- 0xD1457B72C3FB323A2671125AEF3EAB5D

Yup. The true ASCII character set is just the first 128 characters (values 0 - 127). And as we just saw, the è is 232. So, using the ASCII encoding in .NET is not that helpful. Nor was using COLLATE on the T-SQL side.

Is it possible to get a better encoding on the .NET side? Yes, by using Encoding.GetEncoding(Int32), which allows for specifying the Code Page. The Code Page to use can be discovered using the following query (use sys.columns when working with a column instead of a literal or variable):

SELECT sd.[collation_name],
       COLLATIONPROPERTY(sd.[collation_name], 'CodePage') AS [CodePage]
FROM   sys.databases sd
WHERE  sd.[name] = DB_NAME(); -- replace function with N'{db_name}' if not running in the DB

The query above returns (for me):

Latin1_General_100_CI_AS_SC    1252

So, let's try Code Page 1252:

System.Text.Encoding.GetEncoding(1252).GetBytes("è") // Matches HASHBYTES('MD5', 'è')
// 785D512BE4316D578E6650613B45E934

Woo hoo! We have a match for VARCHAR data that uses our default SQL Server collation :). Of course, if the data is coming from a database or field set to a different collation, then GetEncoding(1252) might not work and you will have to find the actual matching Code Page using the query shown above (a Code Page is used across many Collations, so a different Collation does not necessarily imply a different Code Page).

To see what the possible Code Page values are, and what culture / locale they pertain to, please see the list of Code Pages here (list is in the "Remarks" section).

Additional info related to what is actually stored in NVARCHAR / NCHAR fields:

Any UTF-16 character (2 or 4 bytes) can be stored, though the default behavior of the built-in functions assumes that all characters are UCS-2 (2 bytes each), which is a subset of UTF-16. Starting in SQL Server 2012, it is possible to access a set of Windows collations that support the 4 byte characters known as Supplementary Characters. Using one of these Windows collations ending in _SC, either specified for a column or directly in a query, will allow the built-in functions to properly handle the 4 byte characters.

-- The database's collation is set to: SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS
SELECT  N'' AS [SupplementaryCharacter],
        LEN(N'') AS [LEN],
        DATALENGTH(N'') AS [DATALENGTH],
        UNICODE(N'') AS [UNICODE],
        LEFT(N'', 1) AS [LEFT],
        HASHBYTES('MD5', N'') AS [HASHBYTES];

SELECT  N'' AS [SupplementaryCharacter],
        LEN(N'' COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AS_SC) AS [LEN],
        DATALENGTH(N'' COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AS_SC) AS [DATALENGTH],
        UNICODE(N'' COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AS_SC) AS [UNICODE],
        LEFT(N'' COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AS_SC, 1) AS [LEFT],
        HASHBYTES('MD5', N'' COLLATE Latin1_General_100_CI_AS_SC) AS [HASHBYTES];

Returns:

SupplementaryChar   LEN   DATALENGTH   UNICODE   LEFT   HASHBYTES
                  2     4             55393    �     0x7A04F43DA81E3150F539C6B99F4B8FA9
                  1     4            165739         0x7A04F43DA81E3150F539C6B99F4B8FA9

As you can see, neither DATALENGTH nor HASHBYTES are affected. For more information, please see the MSDN page for Collation and Unicode Support (specifically the "Supplementary Characters" section).


SQL Server uses UCS-2 rather than UTF-8 to encode character data.

If you were using an NVarChar field, the following would work:

System.Text.Encoding.Unicode.GetBytes("è"); // Updated per @srutzky's comments

For more information on SQL and C# hashing, see

http://weblogs.sqlteam.com/mladenp/archive/2009/04/28/Comparing-SQL-Server-HASHBYTES-function-and-.Net-hashing.aspx

Tags:

.Net

Sql Server

Tsql

Unicode

Encoding

Recent Posts