user friendly proof of fundamental theorem of calculus
To understand this you will also need to understand the first FTC, and I will show you this. (As you said there may be more than one proof, I will base mine off one similar given in the stewart calculus books).
You may notice during the proof of the first already the connectedness to the derivative which I assume you are familiar with.
$\mathbf{FTC 1:}$ If $f$ is continuous on $[a,b]$ then the function g defined by
$g(x)= \int_{a}^{x} f(t)dt$ for $a \le x \le b$ is continuos on $[a,b]$ and differentiable on $(a,b)$ , and $g'(x)=f(x)$.
$\mathbf{Proof:}$
Suppose we have $x$ and $x+h$ in $(a,b)$, then we have
$$g(x+h)-g(x)= \int_{a}^{x+h}f(t)dt-\int_{a}^{x}f(t)dt$$ $$=\int_{a}^{x}f(t)dt+\int_{x}^{x+h}f(t)dt-\int_{a}^{x}f(t)dt$$
$$=\int_{x}^{x+h}f(t)dt$$
Thus, we have for $h \neq 0$
$$\frac{g(x+h)-g(x)}{h}=\frac{1}{h}\int_{x}^{x+h}f(t)dt$$
If we assume $h \gt 0$ , since f is continuous on $[x,x+h]$ the "Extreme Value Theorem" says that there exists some numbers, u and v in the closed interval $[x,x+h]$ such that $f(u)=m$ and and $f(v)=M$ where $m$ and $M$ represent the inf and sup of the interval respectively.
Thus, by further properties of Riemann integral
$$mh \le \int_{x}^{x+h}f(t)dt \le Mh$$
$\rightarrow$
$$f(u)h \le \int_{x}^{x+h}f(t)dt \le f(v)h$$
$\rightarrow$
$$f(u) \le \frac{1}{h} \int_{x}^{x+h}f(t)dt \le f(v)$$
ie,
$$f(u) \le \frac{g(x+h)-g(x)}{h} \le f(v)$$
( If $h \lt 0$ the same argument can be repeated with small changes)
so now we invoke limits,
Let $h \to 0$ , then you can see that $u \to x$ and $v \to x$ , ( it is clear from the interval they are in).
So both sides limits are the same, thus the limit exists and we have,
$$g'(x)=\lim_{h \to 0} \frac{g(x+h)-g(x)}{h}=f(x)$$
thus , we finally have $$\frac{d}{dx}\int_{a}^{x}f(t)dt=f(x)$$
$\mathbf{FTC2:}$ If f is continuous on $[a,b]$, then $\int_{a}^{b}f(x)dx=F(b)-F(a)$, where F is any antiderivative of f, that is $F'=f$.
$\mathbf{Proof:}$
Let $g(x)= \int_{a}^{x}f(t)dt$, then from FTC1 we have that $g'(x)=f(x)$
That is, g is an anti derivative of f. Now, if there is another antideravative of f, say F , on the same closed interval [a,b] then we know the only difference they can have is a constant,
$F(x)=g(x)+C$.
Consider $g(a)=\int_{a}^{a}f(t)dt=0$
Now consider,
$$F(b)-F(a)=[g(b)+C]-[g(a)+C]$$
$$=g(b)-g(a)=g(b)$$ $$= \int_{a}^{b} f(t)dt$$