Using multiprocessing.Process with a maximum number of simultaneous processes

I think Semaphore is what you are looking for, it will block the main process after counting down to 0. Sample code:

from multiprocessing import Process
from multiprocessing import Semaphore
import time

def f(name, sema):
    print('process {} starting doing business'.format(name))
    # simulate a time-consuming task by sleeping
    time.sleep(5)
    # `release` will add 1 to `sema`, allowing other 
    # processes blocked on it to continue
    sema.release()

if __name__ == '__main__':
    concurrency = 20
    total_task_num = 1000
    sema = Semaphore(concurrency)
    all_processes = []
    for i in range(total_task_num):
        # once 20 processes are running, the following `acquire` call
        # will block the main process since `sema` has been reduced
        # to 0. This loop will continue only after one or more 
        # previously created processes complete.
        sema.acquire()
        p = Process(target=f, args=(i, sema))
        all_processes.append(p)
        p.start()

    # inside main process, wait for all processes to finish
    for p in all_processes:
        p.join()

The following code is more structured since it acquires and releases sema in the same function. However, it will consume too much resources if total_task_num is very large:

from multiprocessing import Process
from multiprocessing import Semaphore
import time

def f(name, sema):
    print('process {} starting doing business'.format(name))
    # `sema` is acquired and released in the same
    # block of code here, making code more readable,
    # but may lead to problem.
    sema.acquire()
    time.sleep(5)
    sema.release()

if __name__ == '__main__':
    concurrency = 20
    total_task_num = 1000
    sema = Semaphore(concurrency)
    all_processes = []
    for i in range(total_task_num):
        p = Process(target=f, args=(i, sema))
        all_processes.append(p)
        # the following line won't block after 20 processes
        # have been created and running, instead it will carry 
        # on until all 1000 processes are created.
        p.start()

    # inside main process, wait for all processes to finish
    for p in all_processes:
        p.join()

The above code will create total_task_num processes but only concurrency processes will be running while other processes are blocked, consuming precious system resources.

It might be most sensible to use multiprocessing.Pool which produces a pool of worker processes based on the max number of cores available on your system, and then basically feeds tasks in as the cores become available.

The example from the standard docs (http://docs.python.org/2/library/multiprocessing.html#using-a-pool-of-workers) shows that you can also manually set the number of cores:

from multiprocessing import Pool

def f(x):
    return x*x

if __name__ == '__main__':
    pool = Pool(processes=4)              # start 4 worker processes
    result = pool.apply_async(f, [10])    # evaluate "f(10)" asynchronously
    print result.get(timeout=1)           # prints "100" unless your computer is *very* slow
    print pool.map(f, range(10))          # prints "[0, 1, 4,..., 81]"

And it's also handy to know that there is the multiprocessing.cpu_count() method to count the number of cores on a given system, if needed in your code.

Edit: Here's some draft code that seems to work for your specific case:

import multiprocessing

def f(name):
    print 'hello', name

if __name__ == '__main__':
    pool = multiprocessing.Pool() #use all available cores, otherwise specify the number you want as an argument
    for i in xrange(0, 512):
        pool.apply_async(f, args=(i,))
    pool.close()
    pool.join()