What does the first "c" stand for in "calloc"?
I did some research and found the following in "UNIX@ TIME-SHARING SYSTEM: UNIX PROGRAMMER'S MANUAL. Seventh Edition, Volume 2", chapter "PROGRAMMING" (Italics by me):
char *malloc(num);
allocates
num
bytes. The pointer returned is sufficiently well aligned to be usable for any purpose.NULL
is returned if no space is available.char *calloc(num, size);
allocates space for
num
items each ofsize
size. The space is guaranteed to be set to 0 and the pointer is sufficiently well aligned to be usable for any purpose.NULL
is returned if no space is available.cfree(ptr) char *ptr;
Space is returned to the pool used by
calloc
. Disorder can be expected if the pointer was not obtained fromcalloc
.
The last sentence is a clear evidence that
calloc()
was definitely (meant to be?) more different frommalloc()
then just by clearing out the memory.Interesting enough there is no reference to
free()
on any of those some hundred pages ... :-)Moreover UNIX V6 already had
calloc()
which callsalloc()
. The (linked) source does not show any approach to zero out any memory.
Concluding from the both facts above I strongly object the theory that the leading "c" in calloc()
stands for "clear".
I don't think anybody knows. But describing the calloc() call with the semantics that the memory must be cleared, as opposed to malloc (memory allocate) which returns any random rubbish that was left over from a previous free() operation, is a useful modus operandi for students, which is useful in that it reminds the user that malloc() returns an unsafe value.
According to an excerpt from the book Linux System Programming (by Robert Love), no official sources exist on the etymology of calloc
.
Some plausible candidates seem to be:
- Count or counted, because
calloc
takes a separate count argument. Clear, because it ensures that the returned memory chunk has been cleared.
- Brian Kernighan is reported to believe that the "c" stands for clear (although he has admitted he's not sure).
- (See comments.) An early
calloc.c
seems to contain an explicit reference to the word clear in a source code comment (but no reference to the word count or to any other candidate). In another source code comment in the filemalloc.c
, the word clear appears again, in reference to the wordcalloc
.
C, as in the C language.
- (See alk's answer and comments.) Possibly a naming convention for a set of functions that were introduced at about the same time.