Why if the torque equals zero measured from one point in space it equals zero measured from any other point?

The sum of the torques is equal only when the sum of the forces is zero. In general the torque transfer from point A to point B is

$$\vec{M_B} = \vec{M_A} + \vec{r}_{AB} \times \vec{F} $$

you can see in your case the sum of the forces is $0.5N$, and the distance between A and B is $3m$ so the difference is $1.5 Nm$ which is what you get.

Change the downward force to $2N$ and try it again, only to see the sum of torques is the same regardless of point of consideration.

BTW: In dynamics, the sum of torque is always taken about the center of mass, in order to yield the correct angular acceleration, because the sum of forces is generally not zero.

You are confusing the words "frame of reference", "point of viewing" and "point of application":

If a body doesn't rotate from one point of view, it won't start rotating if you look at it from another point of view

This is valid only if both points of viewing are in same state, i.e. at rest, or both moving with same velocity or with same acceleration.

Next, when you are doing the experiment, what you have done is calculated torque about 2 different points i.e point A and point B. In this case, you are not seeing a constant torque from 2 point A and B, what you have done is calculated moment of the different forces about different points which is why they are different in magnitude.

To what you heard your teachers say

If the net torque is zero when measured from one frame of reference, it is equal to zero in all other frames of reference

This is inaccurate, suppose a horizontal wheel, if you just stand and see this wheel, it's angular momentum is not changing hence no torque, but if you start running about it with more and more speed, it would seem that the wheel's angular momentum is changing hence in this frame you get a torque!

I'm going to interpret your "frame of reference" as meaning "reference point." This is usually the main concern when dealing with rotating objects. If by frame of reference you really mean different inertial frames, then ignore me.

Short answer: "Rotating" doesn't necessarily mean non-zero angular momentum.

Long answer: See below.

When calculating torque, one must choose a reference point, as you've done. In general, you will get different values of torque when choosing different reference points. Your example is right on.

Here's how to resolve the rotating vs not rotating that you're concerned about. Torque is useful because it relates to angular momentum: $$\vec{\tau}_\text{net}=\frac{d \vec{L}}{dt}=\frac{d}{dt}\int\vec{r}\times\vec{v}\rho\ dV$$ As you can see from the rightmost expression, angular momentum is also reference point-dependent. It's value is different depending on where you choose your reference point to be. It is very easy to conflate a zero (non-zero) value of angular momentum with something spinning (not spinning). That is, just because something has a zero value of angular momentum, that doesn't mean it's not spinning. I suppose this association is so strong because one usually measures the angular momentum (and torque), for simple systems, about the rotation axis. But this doesn't have to be done.

Here's a quick example of what I mean. A spool of mass $m$ is wrapped many times with a string of negligible mass. If you pull the string as shown in the leftmost picture, the spool will translate downward and will also rotate about the center of mass. In this example, you can choose to measure angular momentum (and torque) about the center of mass of the spool. (center picture). By doing so you'll find a non-zero rate of change of angular momentum and a non-zero torque. If instead you measure it along the line of the string (rightmost picuter), you'll find zero torque and zero constant angular momentum, even though it is rotating.