append multiple values for one key in a dictionary
You can use setdefault
.
for line in list:
d.setdefault(year, []).append(value)
This works because setdefault returns the list as well as setting it on the dictionary, and because a list is mutable, appending to the version returned by setdefault is the same as appending it to the version inside the dictionary itself. If that makes any sense.
d = {}
# import list of year,value pairs
for year,value in mylist:
try:
d[year].append(value)
except KeyError:
d[year] = [value]
The Python way - it is easier to receive forgiveness than ask permission!
You would be best off using collections.defaultdict
(added in Python 2.5). This allows you to specify the default object type of a missing key (such as a list
).
So instead of creating a key if it doesn't exist first and then appending to the value of the key, you cut out the middle-man and just directly append to non-existing keys to get the desired result.
A quick example using your data:
>>> from collections import defaultdict
>>> data = [(2010, 2), (2009, 4), (1989, 8), (2009, 7)]
>>> d = defaultdict(list)
>>> d
defaultdict(<type 'list'>, {})
>>> for year, month in data:
... d[year].append(month)
...
>>> d
defaultdict(<type 'list'>, {2009: [4, 7], 2010: [2], 1989: [8]})
This way you don't have to worry about whether you've seen a digit associated with a year or not. You just append and forget, knowing that a missing key will always be a list. If a key already exists, then it will just be appended to.
If I can rephrase your question, what you want is a dictionary with the years as keys and an array for each year containing a list of values associated with that year, right? Here's how I'd do it:
years_dict = dict()
for line in list:
if line[0] in years_dict:
# append the new number to the existing array at this slot
years_dict[line[0]].append(line[1])
else:
# create a new array in this slot
years_dict[line[0]] = [line[1]]
What you should end up with in years_dict is a dictionary that looks like the following:
{
"2010": [2],
"2009": [4,7],
"1989": [8]
}
In general, it's poor programming practice to create "parallel arrays", where items are implicitly associated with each other by having the same index rather than being proper children of a container that encompasses them both.