DateTime vs DateTimeOffset

From Microsoft:

These uses for DateTimeOffset values are much more common than those for DateTime values. As a result, DateTimeOffset should be considered the default date and time type for application development.

_{source: "Choosing Between DateTime, DateTimeOffset, TimeSpan, and TimeZoneInfo", MSDN}

We use DateTimeOffset for nearly everything as our application deals with particular points in time (e.g. when a record was created/updated). As a side note, we use DATETIMEOFFSET in SQL Server 2008 as well.

I see DateTime as being useful when you want to deal with dates only, times only, or deal with either in a generic sense. For example, if you have an alarm that you want to go off every day at 7 am, you could store that in a DateTime utilizing a DateTimeKind of Unspecified because you want it to go off at 7am regardless of DST. But if you want to represent the history of alarm occurrences, you would use DateTimeOffset.

Use caution when using a mix of DateTimeOffset and DateTime especially when assigning and comparing between the types. Also, only compare DateTime instances that are the same DateTimeKind because DateTime ignores timezone offset when comparing.

There's a few places where DateTimeOffset makes sense. One is when you're dealing with recurring events and daylight savings time. Let's say I want to set an alarm to go off at 9am every day. If I use the "store as UTC, display as local time" rule, then the alarm will be going off at a different time when daylight savings time is in effect.

There are probably others, but the above example is actually one that I've run into in the past (this was before the addition of DateTimeOffset to the BCL - my solution at the time was to explicitly store the time in the local timezone, and save the timezone information along side it: basically what DateTimeOffset does internally).

DateTime is capable of storing only two distinct times, the local time and UTC. The Kind property indicates which.

DateTimeOffset expands on this by being able to store local times from anywhere in the world. It also stores the offset between that local time and UTC. Note how DateTime cannot do this unless you'd add an extra member to your class to store that UTC offset. Or only ever work with UTC. Which in itself is a fine idea btw.

DateTimeOffset is a representation of instantaneous time (also known as absolute time). By that, I mean a moment in time that is universal for everyone (not accounting for leap seconds, or the relativistic effects of time dilation). Another way to represent instantaneous time is with a DateTime where .Kind is DateTimeKind.Utc.

This is distinct from calendar time (also known as civil time), which is a position on someone's calendar, and there are many different calendars all over the globe. We call these calendars time zones. Calendar time is represented by a DateTime where .Kind is DateTimeKind.Unspecified, or DateTimeKind.Local. And .Local is only meaningful in scenarios where you have an implied understanding of where the computer that is using the result is positioned. (For example, a user's workstation)

So then, why DateTimeOffset instead of a UTC DateTime? It's all about perspective. Let's use an analogy - we'll pretend to be photographers.

Imagine you are standing on a calendar timeline, pointing a camera at a person on the instantaneous timeline laid out in front of you. You line up your camera according to the rules of your timezone - which change periodically due to daylight saving time, or due to other changes to the legal definition of your time zone. (You don't have a steady hand, so your camera is shaky.)

The person standing in the photo would see the angle at which your camera came from. If others were taking pictures, they could be from different angles. This is what the Offset part of the DateTimeOffset represents.

So if you label your camera "Eastern Time", sometimes you are pointing from -5, and sometimes you are pointing from -4. There are cameras all over the world, all labeled different things, and all pointing at the same instantaneous timeline from different angles. Some of them are right next to (or on top of) each other, so just knowing the offset isn't enough to determine which timezone the time is related to.

And what about UTC? Well, it's the one camera out there that is guaranteed to have a steady hand. It's on a tripod, firmly anchored into the ground. It's not going anywhere. We call its angle of perspective the zero offset.

So - what does this analogy tell us? It provides some intuitive guidelines-

• If you are representing time relative to some place in particular, represent it in calendar time with a DateTime. Just be sure you don't ever confuse one calendar with another. Unspecified should be your assumption. Local is only useful coming from DateTime.Now. For example, I might get DateTime.Now and save it in a database - but when I retrieve it, I have to assume that it is Unspecified. I can't rely that my local calendar is the same calendar that it was originally taken from.

• If you must always be certain of the moment, make sure you are representing instantaneous time. Use DateTimeOffset to enforce it, or use UTC DateTime by convention.

• If you need to track a moment of instantaneous time, but you want to also know "What time did the user think it was on their local calendar?" - then you must use a DateTimeOffset. This is very important for timekeeping systems, for example - both for technical and legal concerns.

• If you ever need to modify a previously recorded DateTimeOffset - you don't have enough information in the offset alone to ensure that the new offset is still relevant for the user. You must also store a timezone identifier (think - I need the name of that camera so I can take a new picture even if the position has changed).

  It should also be pointed out that Noda Time has a representation called ZonedDateTime for this, while the .Net base class library does not have anything similar. You would need to store both a DateTimeOffset and a TimeZoneInfo.Id value.

• Occasionally, you will want to represent a calendar time that is local to "whomever is looking at it". For example, when defining what today means. Today is always midnight to midnight, but these represent a near-infinite number of overlapping ranges on the instantaneous timeline. (In practice we have a finite number of timezones, but you can express offsets down to the tick) So in these situations, make sure you understand how to either limit the "who's asking?" question down to a single time zone, or deal with translating them back to instantaneous time as appropriate.

Here are a few other little bits about DateTimeOffset that back up this analogy, and some tips for keeping it straight:

• If you compare two DateTimeOffset values, they are first normalized to zero offset before comparing. In other words, 2012-01-01T00:00:00+00:00 and 2012-01-01T02:00:00+02:00 refer to the same instantaneous moment, and are therefore equivalent.

• If you are doing any unit testing and need to be certain of the offset, test both the DateTimeOffset value, and the .Offset property separately.

• There is a one-way implicit conversion built in to the .Net framework that lets you pass a DateTime into any DateTimeOffset parameter or variable. When doing so, the .Kind matters. If you pass a UTC kind, it will carry in with a zero offset, but if you pass either .Local or .Unspecified, it will assume to be local. The framework is basically saying, "Well, you asked me to convert calendar time to instantaneous time, but I have no idea where this came from, so I'm just going to use the local calendar." This is a huge gotcha if you load up an unspecified DateTime on a computer with a different timezone. (IMHO - that should throw an exception - but it doesn't.)

Shameless Plug:

Many people have shared with me that they find this analogy extremely valuable, so I included it in my Pluralsight course, Date and Time Fundamentals. You'll find a step-by-step walkthrough of the camera analogy in the second module, "Context Matters", in the clip titled "Calendar Time vs. Instantaneous Time".