django - why is the request.POST object immutable?

If the request was the result of a Django form submission, then it is reasonable for POST being immutable to ensure the integrity of the data between the form submission and the form validation. However, if the request was not sent via a Django form submission, then POST is mutable as there is no form validation.

You can always do something like this: (as per @leo-the-manic's comment)

#  .....
mutable = request.POST._mutable
request.POST._mutable = True
request.POST['some_data'] = 'test data'
request.POST._mutable = mutable
# ......

Update:

Gareth Rees was right that point 1 & 3 were not valid in this case. Though I think point 2 and 4 are still valid, therefore I will leave theses here.

(I noticed that the request.POST object of both Pyramid(Pylon) and Django is some form of MultiDict. So perhaps it is a more common practice than making request.POST immutable.)

---

I can't speak for the Django guys, though it seems to me that it could because of some of these reasons:

1. Performence. immutable objects are "faster" over mutable ones in that they allow substantial optimizations. An object is immutable means that we can allocate space for it at creation time, and the space requirements are not changing. It also has things like copy efficiency and comparison efficiency because of it. Edit: this is not the case for QueryDict as Gareth Rees pointed out.
2. In the case of request.POST, it seems no activity in the server side should need to alter the request's data. And hence immutable objects are more suited, not to mention they have substantial performence advantage.
3. Immutable objects can be used as dict keys, which I suppose could be very useful somewhere in Django.. Edit: my mistake, immutable does not directly imply hashable; hashable objects however, are typically immutable as well.
4. When you pass around request.POST (especially to third-party plugins and out), you can expect that this request object from the user will remain unchanged.

In some way these reasons are also generic answers to "immutable vs mutable?" question. I am certain there are much more design considerations than above in the Django case.

I like it being immutable by default. As pointed out you can make it mutable if you need to but you must be explicit about it. It is like 'I know that I can make my form debugging a nightmare but I know what I am doing now.'

It's a bit of a mystery, isn't it? Several superficially plausible theories turn out to be wrong on investigation:

1. So that the POST object doesn't have to implement mutation methods? No: the POST object belongs to the django.http.QueryDict class, which implements a full set of mutation methods including __setitem__, __delitem__, pop and clear. It implements immutability by checking a flag when you call one of the mutation methods. And when you call the copy method you get another QueryDict instance with the mutable flag turned on.

2. For performance improvement? No: the QueryDict class gains no performance benefit when the mutable flag is turned off.

3. So that the POST object can be used as a dictionary key? No: QueryDict objects are not hashable.

4. So that the POST data can be built lazily (without committing to read the whole response), as claimed here? I see no evidence of this in the code: as far as I can tell, the whole of the response is always read, either directly, or via MultiPartParser for multipart responses.

5. To protect you against programming errors? I've seen this claimed, but I've never seen a good explanation of what these errors are, and how immutability protects you against them.

In any case, POST is not always immutable: when the response is multipart, then POST is mutable. This seems to put the kibosh on most theories you might think of. (Unless this behaviour is an oversight.)

In summary, I can see no clear rationale in Django for the POST object to be immutable for non-multipart requests.