How can I pass an Integer class correctly by reference?

There are two problems:

  1. Integer is pass by value, not by reference. Changing the reference inside a method won't be reflected into the passed-in reference in the calling method.
  2. Integer is immutable. There's no such method like Integer#set(i). You could otherwise just make use of it.

To get it to work, you need to reassign the return value of the inc() method.

integer = inc(integer);

To learn a bit more about passing by value, here's another example:

public static void main(String... args) {
    String[] strings = new String[] { "foo", "bar" };
    changeReference(strings);
    System.out.println(Arrays.toString(strings)); // still [foo, bar]
    changeValue(strings);
    System.out.println(Arrays.toString(strings)); // [foo, foo]
}
public static void changeReference(String[] strings) {
    strings = new String[] { "foo", "foo" };
}
public static void changeValue(String[] strings) {
    strings[1] = "foo";
}

There are 2 ways to pass by reference

  1. Use org.apache.commons.lang.mutable.MutableInt from Apache Commons library.
  2. Create custom class as shown below

Here's a sample code to do it:

public class Test {
    public static void main(String args[]) {
        Integer a = new Integer(1);
        Integer b = a;
        Test.modify(a);
        System.out.println(a);
        System.out.println(b);

        IntegerObj ao = new IntegerObj(1);
        IntegerObj bo = ao;
        Test.modify(ao);
        System.out.println(ao.value);
        System.out.println(bo.value);
    }


    static void modify(Integer x) {
        x=7;
    }
    static void modify(IntegerObj x) {
        x.value=7;
    }   
}

class IntegerObj {
    int value;
    IntegerObj(int val) {
        this.value = val;
    }
}

Output:

1
1
7
7

Good answers above explaining the actual question from the OP.

If anyone needs to pass around a number that needs to be globally updated, use the AtomicInteger() instead of creating the various wrapper classes suggested or relying on 3rd party libs.

The AtomicInteger() is of course mostly used for thread safe access but if the performance hit is no issue, why not use this built-in class. The added bonus is of course the obvious thread safety.

import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger

The Integer is immutable. You can wrap int in your custom wrapper class.

class WrapInt{
    int value;
}

WrapInt theInt = new WrapInt();

inc(theInt);
System.out.println("main: "+theInt.value);