Alternatives to Heartbeat, Pacemaker and CoroSync?

Solution 1:

I prefer to use keepalived for high-availability. I find it simpler to setup (one daemon and config) than heartbeat and company. The only drawback I run into, is that keepalived doesn't have a unicast option by default, and only uses VRRP for communication (The author of HAProxy has written a unicast patch for keepalived however)

Solution 2:

I am actually working on something very similar to what you described (a fail-over cluster on EC2), and after trying out Heartbeat, settled on Corosync as my messaging layer. Corosync will run on multiple servers and it does support Unicast (UDPU) as of version 1.3.0 (from Nov, 2010). I have setup and tested Corosync on Amazon's EC2 cloud (using Amazon's Linux AMI) and can confirm it works without issue.

A sample udpu file is installed to /etc/corosync.

Add one member block to the interface section for each node, and specify the transport as updu. (I have used the same port as heartbeat in the example below, but you can change it as desired).

e.g.:

totem {
        version: 2
        secauth: off
        interface {
                member {
                        memberaddr: 10.xxx.xxx.xxx
                }
                member {
                        memberaddr: 10.xxx.xxx.xxx
                }
                ringnumber: 0
                bindnetaddr: 10.xxx.xxx.xxx
                mcastport: 694
        }
        transport: udpu
}

(Heartbeat is supposed to support 3+ node clusters in versions 1.2.3+, although, I have never tried it personally, and don't know if it would work with Unicast).

---

Solution 3:

Sorry, but the part about Pacemaker is not true. The Pacemaker regression and release tests make extensive use of automation.

To configure without an active cluster, prefix all commands with CIB_file=/var/lib/heartbeat/crm/cib.xml or set it in your environment. Just be sure you remove the .sig file before starting the cluster.

For clusters without quorum, most if not all tools should support -f or --force which will instruct the cluster to accept the change anyway. If you find a tool that does not - please file a bug.

---

Solution 4:

In the open source world, there's RedHat Cluster Suite. It's been several years since I've implemented RHCS so I don't have many relevant things to say about it today.

Commercially, there is Veritas Cluster Server. No experience with it.

A much simpler and open source HA tool is UCARP. UCARP doesn't provide nearly the same kind of "infrastructure" that Heartbeat/Pacemaker/CoroSync does but you can build HA solutions around it.

You can also build highly available infrastructure with virtualization technologies but these solutions tend to focus on host-level availability as opposed to application level availability.