Waiting until a file is available for reading with Win32
I don't think there is a notification for the kind of event you're looking for, but as an improvement, I'd suggest progressive delays. This way you will get fast response times for stuff like a drag/drop and won't hog the CPU with a tight loop if the user keeps the file open for an hour in Excel.
int delay= 10;
while ((hFile = CreateFile (path, GENERIC_READ, FILE_SHARE_READ, NULL, OPEN_EXISTING, 0, NULL)) == INVALID_HANDLE_VALUE)
{
if (GetLastError() == ERROR_SHARING_VIOLATION) {
Sleep (delay);
if (delay<5120) // max delay approx 5.Sec
delay*= 2;
}
else
break; // some other error occurred
}
There's no user-mode API for notifications on a closed file that I'm aware of. The loop you've proposed is really probably the best way. The only other thing you could do would be to watch for CloseFile
in a filter driver ala Process Monitor, but yuck...
As @Matt Davis said, there is unfortunately no user-mode API but there is a workaround that depending on your use-case (I've written mine below) may do just what you want.
What worked for me in the past was registering for FILE_NOTIFY_CHANGE_LAST_WRITE
instead of FILE_NOTIFY_CHANGE_FILE_NAME
when calling ReadDirectoryChangesW
:
ZeroMemory(&overlapped, sizeof(OVERLAPPED));
overlapped.hEvent = hChangeEvent;
// ...
ReadDirectoryChangesW(hSpoolPath,
eventBuffer,
EVENT_BUF_LENGTH,
FALSE,
FILE_NOTIFY_CHANGE_LAST_WRITE, // <----
NULL,
&overlapped,
NULL);
// ...
HANDLE events[2];
events[0] = hChangeEvent;
events[1] = hCancelEvent;
DWORD wRc = WaitForMultipleObjects(2, events, FALSE, DIRECTORY_WATCH_TIMEOUT);
The last write time gets updated as soon as the owning process closes the handle after creating the file and writing to it.
My use-case was one process that received HTTP-requests via TCP/IP and wrote the HTTP-body into a directory, where another process picked it up as soon as the receiving process was finished writing (and consequently closing the handle) it. The http-server was the only process that wrote to that directory, so I could rely on the create-write-close pattern.