When to use reinterpret_cast?
One case when reinterpret_cast
is necessary is when interfacing with opaque data types. This occurs frequently in vendor APIs over which the programmer has no control. Here's a contrived example where a vendor provides an API for storing and retrieving arbitrary global data:
// vendor.hpp
typedef struct _Opaque * VendorGlobalUserData;
void VendorSetUserData(VendorGlobalUserData p);
VendorGlobalUserData VendorGetUserData();
To use this API, the programmer must cast their data to VendorGlobalUserData
and back again. static_cast
won't work, one must use reinterpret_cast
:
// main.cpp
#include "vendor.hpp"
#include <iostream>
using namespace std;
struct MyUserData {
MyUserData() : m(42) {}
int m;
};
int main() {
MyUserData u;
// store global data
VendorGlobalUserData d1;
// d1 = &u; // compile error
// d1 = static_cast<VendorGlobalUserData>(&u); // compile error
d1 = reinterpret_cast<VendorGlobalUserData>(&u); // ok
VendorSetUserData(d1);
// do other stuff...
// retrieve global data
VendorGlobalUserData d2 = VendorGetUserData();
MyUserData * p = 0;
// p = d2; // compile error
// p = static_cast<MyUserData *>(d2); // compile error
p = reinterpret_cast<MyUserData *>(d2); // ok
if (p) { cout << p->m << endl; }
return 0;
}
Below is a contrived implementation of the sample API:
// vendor.cpp
static VendorGlobalUserData g = 0;
void VendorSetUserData(VendorGlobalUserData p) { g = p; }
VendorGlobalUserData VendorGetUserData() { return g; }
The C++ standard guarantees the following:
static_cast
ing a pointer to and from void*
preserves the address. That is, in the following, a
, b
and c
all point to the same address:
int* a = new int();
void* b = static_cast<void*>(a);
int* c = static_cast<int*>(b);
reinterpret_cast
only guarantees that if you cast a pointer to a different type, and then reinterpret_cast
it back to the original type, you get the original value. So in the following:
int* a = new int();
void* b = reinterpret_cast<void*>(a);
int* c = reinterpret_cast<int*>(b);
a
and c
contain the same value, but the value of b
is unspecified. (in practice it will typically contain the same address as a
and c
, but that's not specified in the standard, and it may not be true on machines with more complex memory systems.)
For casting to and from void*
, static_cast
should be preferred.
The short answer:
If you don't know what reinterpret_cast
stands for, don't use it. If you will need it in the future, you will know.
Full answer:
Let's consider basic number types.
When you convert for example int(12)
to unsigned float (12.0f)
your processor needs to invoke some calculations as both numbers has different bit representation. This is what static_cast
stands for.
On the other hand, when you call reinterpret_cast
the CPU does not invoke any calculations. It just treats a set of bits in the memory like if it had another type. So when you convert int*
to float*
with this keyword, the new value (after pointer dereferecing) has nothing to do with the old value in mathematical meaning (ignoring the fact that it is undefined behavior to read this value).
Be aware that reading or modifying values after reinterprt_cast'ing are very often Undefined Behavior. In most cases, you should use pointer or reference to std::byte
(starting from C++17) if you want to achieve the bit representation of some data, it is almost always a legal operation. Other "safe" types are char
and unsigned char
, but I would say it shouldn't be used for that purpose in modern C++ as std::byte
has better semantics.
Example: It is true that reinterpret_cast
is not portable because of one reason - byte order (endianness). But this is often surprisingly the best reason to use it. Let's imagine the example: you have to read binary 32bit number from file, and you know it is big endian. Your code has to be generic and works properly on big endian (e.g. some ARM) and little endian (e.g. x86) systems. So you have to check the byte order. It is well-known on compile time so you can write You can write a function to achieve this:constexpr
function:
/*constexpr*/ bool is_little_endian() {
std::uint16_t x=0x0001;
auto p = reinterpret_cast<std::uint8_t*>(&x);
return *p != 0;
}
Explanation: the binary representation of x
in memory could be 0000'0000'0000'0001
(big) or 0000'0001'0000'0000
(little endian). After reinterpret-casting the byte under p
pointer could be respectively 0000'0000
or 0000'0001
. If you use static-casting, it will always be 0000'0001
, no matter what endianness is being used.
EDIT:
In the first version I made example function is_little_endian
to be constexpr
. It compiles fine on the newest gcc (8.3.0) but the standard says it is illegal. The clang compiler refuses to compile it (which is correct).